Section of Taxation Publications
  VOL. 53
NO. 3
Contents | TTL Home

 Note: The following is an excerpt from the introduction to the article as published in The Tax Lawyer. Author citations have been omitted for brevity. Tax Section members may read the article in its entirety in Adobe Acrobat format.

Gain-Triggering Abandonment of Leasehold Subject to Nonrecourse Debt Occurred upon Agreement Transferring Substantive Ownership: L & C Springs Associates v. Commissioner
Nina S. Tallon


In L & C Springs Associates v. Commissioner, the Seventh Circuit held that, for purposes of triggering gain through debt cancellation, abandonment of property occurred when the taxpayer lessee was effectively relieved of its nonrecourse debt obligation and its leasehold interest in the property. The Seventh Circuit affirmed the Tax Court’s ruling to this effect even though the foreclosure sale and transfer of legal title took place the following year. The Seventh Circuit also held that the taxpayer’s right of redemption, if it existed at all, did not preclude recognition of gain from abandonment. This case represents the first time a circuit court has addressed the timing of abandonment in the context of gain-triggering debt cancellation.

Part I of this Note presents the factual background and statutory framework of the L & C Springs cases. Part II explains the opinion of the Tax Court. Part III describes the parties’ arguments on appeal and discusses the opinion of the Seventh Circuit. Finally, Part IV analyzes the Seventh Circuit’s decision and discusses its implications.


Published by
Section of Taxation, American Bar Association
With the Assistance of
Georgetown University Law Center


If you are an ABA member, you can receive The Tax Lawyer and the Section NewsQuarterly, both quarterly publications, when you join the Section of Taxation. Anyone can subscribe to The Tax Lawyer by contacting the ABA Service Center.