Editor’s Column

Vol. 53 No. 1


In this, the fall issue of Infrastructure, we have tried to capture the background and consequences of two important Supreme Court decisions. One of these, Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. Herrmann, involves the availability of an increasingly precious resource—water. The effort of Texas to divert water ostensibly governed by the Red River Compact in the face of Oklahoma’s protectionist statutes invoked the commerce clause as well as the terms of the Compact. The need for water in the case under examination arose in the growing Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Although the decision limited the Oklahoma statutes, it left unanswered the broader issue of availability of water supplies for growing and thirsty areas.

Premium Content for:

  • ABA Infrastructure and Regulated Industries Section Members
Join Now

Already a member? Log In


  • About Infrastructure

  • More Information

  • Contact Us