Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

Regulatory Takings after Knick summarizes the Supreme Court's recent decision in Knick v. Township of Scott which does away with the state action prong of the Court's former ripeness test and what it means for the law of regulatory taking of property. It emphasizes total takings after Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission and the exceptions which permit government to so strictly regulate property as to permit no economically beneficial use of it.

$00

NON-MEMBERS

$00

MEMBERS

$00

SECTION MEMBERS

Rate

$00

NON-MEMBERS

$00

MEMBERS

$00

SECTION MEMBERS

Rate

Quantity

*Additional discounts may apply at checkout

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Knick v. Township of Scott has been aptly described by some commentators as the most significant property rights case of the last decade. In Knick, the Court found the regulatory takings claim, which had not yet been denied compensation in state court, was ripe nonetheless. In doing so, the Court explicitly overturned the second prong of the so-called Williamson County ripeness test that required property owners to seek a remedy through state action -- usually just compensation -- for the alleged taking before coming to federal court.

The elements of these exceptions are explained in great detail in separate chapters. Understanding these exceptions is critical to litigating about land use regulations for such as open space, agriculture, and preservation/conservation where the subject land is left without any economic use. If the exceptions apply, the landowner gets no compensation. If the exceptions do not apply, the landowner prevails.

Authors

David Lee Callies

Publishers

ABA Book Publishing

ISBN

9781641057486

Page Count

133

Product Code

5330252

Trim Size

6x9

Publication Date

8/18/2020 12:00:00 AM

Resources

About the Author

Index

Sample Chapter

Preface

Audio and Video | On-Demand CLE

Disparities in K-12 Discipline (On-Demand CLE) [CC]

Audio and Video | On-Demand CLE

Insurance Provisions Needed to Protect Your Client - Really! (On Demand CLE)

Audio and Video | On-Demand CLE

State and Local Government Virtual Fall Conference - Homelessness, Voting Rights, Education, Disasters [CC]

Feb

Events | Webinar

RPTE Book Club Presentation on “The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America”

The Section's Diversity and Inclusion Committee is proud to host New York Times Best Selling author Richard Rothstein for a presentation on his book The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our G…

Jan

Events | Webinar

Professors' Corner - The Legacies of Racial Restrictive Covenants

In Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), the Court held that racial restrictive covenants could not be enforced in the courts, yet their legacies continue. Current neighborhoods continue to reflect the patterns…

Jan

Events | Webinar

SWAPs, Derivatives and the Death of LIBOR: What Have We Gotten Ourselves Into?

CLE 90 min

This program will cover the fundamentals of interest rate swaps and their role in loan transactions. In addition, the panelists will discuss how the end of LIBOR is expected to impact LIBOR-denominat…

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies