Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

Regulatory Takings after Knick summarizes the Supreme Court's recent decision in Knick v. Township of Scott which does away with the state action prong of the Court's former ripeness test and what it means for the law of regulatory taking of property. It emphasizes total takings after Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission and the exceptions which permit government to so strictly regulate property as to permit no economically beneficial use of it.

$79

NON-MEMBERS

$71

MEMBERS

$63

SECTION MEMBERS

Rate

$79

NON-MEMBERS

$71

MEMBERS

$63

SECTION MEMBERS

Rate

Quantity

*Additional discounts may apply at checkout

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Knick v. Township of Scott has been aptly described by some commentators as the most significant property rights case of the last decade. In Knick, the Court found the regulatory takings claim, which had not yet been denied compensation in state court, was ripe nonetheless. In doing so, the Court explicitly overturned the second prong of the so-called Williamson County ripeness test that required property owners to seek a remedy through state action -- usually just compensation -- for the alleged taking before coming to federal court.

The elements of these exceptions are explained in great detail in separate chapters. Understanding these exceptions is critical to litigating about land use regulations for such as open space, agriculture, and preservation/conservation where the subject land is left without any economic use. If the exceptions apply, the landowner gets no compensation. If the exceptions do not apply, the landowner prevails.

Authors

David Lee Callies

Publishers

ABA Book Publishing

ISBN

9781641057486

Page Count

133

Product Code

5330252

Trim Size

6x9

Publication Date

8/18/2020 12:00:00 AM

Resources

About the Author

Preface

Index

Sample Chapter

Audio and Video | On-Demand CLE

Drones and UAS: Regulatory Update and What's Next on the Horizon for Users and Owners (On-Demand CLE)

Audio and Video | On-Demand CLE

Land Rights in Myanmar: Past, Present and Future Challenges and Opportunities [CC]

Audio and Video | On-Demand CLE

Defending Consumer Protection Actions on Multiple Fronts: Coordinating Joint CFPB and State AG Investigations and Settlements (On-Demand CLE)

May

Events | Webinar

Covenants in Mortgage Documents - More and More, Not Less

CLE 90 min

During this session our panelists will discuss: · DSCR and LTV Ratios · Transfer of Equity Interests in the Borrowing Entity · Nonrecourse Carveouts Today · High Volati…

Apr

Events | Webinar

Creative Estate Planning Strategies for Using Lifetime QTIPs

CLE 90 min

Why You Should Attend: Lifetime QTIPs, once used infrequently, are now increasing in popularity as planners see their tremendous benefits. In fact, lifetime QTIPs are perhaps one of the best and most…

Jul

Events | Webinar

Live from Skills Training: Planning for the Multinational Client

CLE 90 min

As clients become more global in their business and personal affairs, estate planners need to learn the traps and opportunities when advising non-US persons who have US beneficiaries and/or US invest…

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies

Regulatory Takings after Knick: Total Takings, the Nuisance Exception, and Background Principles Exceptions: Public Trust Doctrine, Custom, and Statutes.

By David Lee Callies