"After almost 40 years in practice I have come to expect certain characteristics from every legal treatise I pick up. They will be difficult to understand if the reader does not already have significant expertise in the field. There will be no apparent sense to how they are organized. And, to find citations to authority which is factually on point to the case for which I am conducting the research, requires me to wade through scores of fine-print footnotes—assuming I find factually applicable authority at all. After working with The Law of Trade Secrets Litigation Under the Uniform Trade Secret Act by J. Patrick Huston, my reaction was: ‘Why hasn’t every legal treatise been written and organized like this?’
“I expected The Law of Trade Secret Litigation under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, consisting of more than 4,000 pages written by a leading authority on the topic, to be a thorough and complete discussion of the law. I was not disappointed. What surprised and impressed me most, however, was how “user friendly” the treatise was. Mr. Huston writes like the best appellate lawyers, clearly, with simple but descriptive language, which is easy to read and understand. The text is organized flawlessly. I found a review of the table of contents itself to be like a refresher course on Trade Secret litigation. Each element of a Trade Secret claim and all applicable remedies are identified clearly, summarized, then discussed in detail.
Following the detailed analysis of each issue, Mr. Huston has provided synopses of Uniform Trade Secrets Act cases relevant to that issue. What makes this text different than any others of which I am aware, is (1) the case summaries provide sufficient information regarding the factual background of the case and the legal issues which were addressed by the court from which the reader can determine, without the need to read the entire case, if it is on point; and (2) the cases are organized based upon the underlying facts, which makes finding cases ‘factually on point’ a breeze. For example, cases regarding customer lists are together, as are cases which deal with more discrete issues, like frozen food and oil refining chemicals.
Those who have handled litigation under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act are well aware of the many traps for the unwary—some of which are not apparent and can be devastating. Those who are venturing into the area for the first time should be forewarned—you can’t wing it. Fortunately, neither the veteran of UTSA litigation, nor the novice, needs to be armed with anything more than The Law of Trade Secret Litigation Under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act in order to navigate this unique and challenging area of the law like a pro.”
Mark Mazzarella | Mazzarella & Mazzarella - Past Chair of the Litigation Section of the California State Bar; Past President of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers – San Diego