YourABA: June 2013
YourABA September 2013 Masthead

Review of the billable hour finds few signs of life

The economic collapse of 2007 and the resulting Great Recession led consumers to re-evaluate their spending habits. Legal services consumers, already questioning the rationale for the billable hour, increasingly looked for alternative fee arrangements to drive down legal costs. Participants at the Aug. 8 Annual Meeting program “Has the News of the Death of the Billable Hour Been Greatly Exaggerated?” discussed the rise of AFAs and the resulting complications.

Evelyn Brantley, DuPont's managing counsel for operations and partnering, introduced the perspective of the client. As in-house counsel, Brantley works with law firms contracted to provide legal services to DuPont. Brantley said that every discussion about payment begins with “the talk,” a “necessarily difficult” conversation where a law firm is negotiating with a potential client over payment. Brantley argued that AFAs make the conversation less difficult because they incentivize law firms to work efficiently and give clients an opportunity to control costs.

Brantley cautioned that many law firms “market heavily that they participate in AFAs,” yet only offer “pseudo-AFAs” or quickly move away from the payment structure if they believe that they can make significantly more under a traditional billable hour model.

Jean Bertrand, a San Francisco lawyer with Schiff Hardin LLP, emphasized that AFAs come in many forms and that law firms should take care to use the most appropriate model that fits their needs. The basis of any AFA, Bertrand said, is “trust, fairness and transparency.” The first step for a law firm should be to “identify the client's top priority” and then decide on a payment model that “enables [lawyers] to sell clients what they are trying to buy.”

Regardless of the model, Bertrand emphasized that every AFA should have an “escape clause” if the nature of the case changes and the agreed-upon payment scheme becomes untenable.

Valorem Law Group LLC's Patrick Lamb discussed the economic theory behind billable hours and AFAs and concluded that “Every fee arrangement is designed to drive behavior.” Lamb argued that the billable hour model encourages unscrupulous behavior on the part of law firms that depend on increasing the number of hours on a case, a situation Lamb called “shocking.” Lamb further argued that “Clients don't buy time, they buy outcomes,” which makes AFAs more rational to clients.

“Has the News of the Death of the Billable Hour Been Greatly Exaggerated?” was sponsored by the Section of Litigation. Additional materials from this program can be found on the section webpage.

Back to top


Shades of Rashomon:
2 views of 48 hours in the life of a client


Practical encryption: 3 tips for the average lawyer


Meet new ABA President James R. Silkenat


Plan in advance to handle crisis communications

Review of the billable hour finds few signs of life

Encryption, complex passwords are best ways to protect client data

How to better serve corporate clients

5 women lawyers honored with 2013 Margaret Brent Awards

Legal career counselors share 10 tips on how to achieve work-life goals

Law firm leaders explore what millennial lawyers think about diversity and inclusion

DOMA, Prop 8 rulings leave web of employment benefits laws to untangle

What you need to know about minimizing data breaches


Dues reminder


Be prepared when disaster strikes