Can the proposed Equal Rights Amendment, which has languished since Congress’ deadline for ratification expired more than four decades ago, experience a resurrection? Updated ABA policy hopes so.
August 19, 2024 Top Legal News of the Week
ABA updates policy with focus on renewing ERA effort
At the American Bar Association House of Delegates meeting in early August, the policymaking body overwhelmingly voted to reiterate ABA support of the proposed 28th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. But the new policy goes further than the broad endorsements in 1972, 1974 and 2016. Specifically, it supports two important legal principles: (1) a deadline for ratification of an amendment to the U.S. Constitution is not consistent with Article V of the Constitution; and (2) that under Article V states are not permitted to rescind prior ratifications.
Congress passed the ERA in 1972, sending it to the states for ratification. Its text declares that “equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex.” The initial resolution included a seven-year ratification deadline in its preamble, which by then was customary for amendments. In 1978, Congress extended the time limit to 1982. By the time the second deadline passed, only 35 of the 38 needed states had ratified it.
Since then, three states have ratified the amendment, with Virginia the most recent in early 2020. While the then-Democratic-controlled House of Representatives approved elimination of the 1982 ERA deadline in late 2019, the then-Republican-controlled Senate did not act, effectively stifling the effort.
Any move now to resurrect the amendment would likely face constitutional and legal challenges beyond the deadline issue. In 1981, a federal judge in Idaho ruled that a state could rescind its ratification prior to the 1982 deadline. Altogether, six states have purportedly rescinded prior ratifications, and the National Archivist has not moved to certify the ERA pursuant to federal law.
The Founding Fathers extensively debated the process to change the U.S. Constitution, before making it difficult to do so. Since the first 10 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were added to the Constitution in 1791, the sacred document has been amended only 17 times, with the last being the 27th Amendment regarding congressional pay in 1992.
The U.S. Supreme Court has offered limited guidance on how to interpret the 143 words of Article V, in addition to never addressing the rescission question posed by the Idaho case.
Related links:
- House of Delegates Resolution 601: ERA with report
- Congressional Research Service: “The Proposed Equal Rights Amendment: Contemporary Ratification Issues”
- ABA Legal Fact Check: ERA
- Key court cases related to Article V:
- Dillion v. Gloss, U.S. Supreme Court
- Coleman v. Miller, U.S. Supreme Court
- State of Idaho v. Freeman, U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho
- Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute: 1 U.S. Code § 106b - Amendments to Constitution
- ABA Journal: