Within the context of the Holocaust, new book explores legal, moral duties of bystanders

CHICAGO, April 20, 2017 — Consider this dilemma: You are a bystander and witness to a crime. Should your intervention in an attempt to prevent that crime be a legal obligation? Or is moral responsibility enough?

On the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Week, law professor and author Amos. N. Guiora addresses these profoundly important and timely questions in his new book, “The Crime of Complicity: The Bystander in the Holocaust,” published earlier this month by Ankerwycke, the trade imprint of the American Bar Association.

Guiora, who teaches law at the University of Utah and is a retired lieutenant colonel in the Israel Defense Forces, delves into the bystander-victim relationship from deeply personal and legal perspectives, focusing on the Holocaust and then exploring cases in contemporary society.

Sharing the experiences of his parents and grandparents during the Holocaust and drawing on a wide range of historical material and interviews, he studies the bystander during three distinct events: the forcible movement of prisoners in Nazi Germany known as death marches, the German occupation of Holland and the German occupation of Hungary. He explains that while the Third Reich created policy, its implementation was dependent on bystander non-intervention.

Guiora then fast forwards decades later to explore sexual assault cases at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and Stanford University in California, as well as other crimes where bystanders had to choose to act or not. Their actions — or nonactions — carried real consequences.

“Questions of bystander complicity are, unfortunately, highly relevant to contemporary society,” Guiora said. “A casual glance at the daily news sheds disturbing light on the consequences of bystander non-intervention. Drawing on the lessons of the Holocaust is particularly useful in determining the extent of the bystander’s complicity in our lives today.”

Guiora asserts in “The Crime of Complicity” that a society cannot rely on morals and compassion alone in determining obligations to assist another in danger. It is ultimately, he concludes, a legal issue and a society must make the obligation to intervene the law and non-intervention a crime.

Besides his teaching duties and lectures around the world, Guiora is involved in the effort to legislate Holocaust-Genocide education in Utah public schools. He is the author of several books, including “Freedom from Religion: Rights and National Security” and “Tolerating Intolerance: The Price of Protecting Extremism.”

Title:               “The Crime of Complicity: The Bystander in the Holocaust”
Author:           Amos N. Guiora
Publisher:      Ankerwycke (trade imprint of the American Bar Association)
Binding:         Hardcover / 220 pages
ISBN/Price:    978-1-63425-731-2 ($29.95)
E-Book:          978-1-63425-732-9 ($9.99)
Orders:            Order the book at shopaba.org or call 800-285-2221.

What others are saying about “The Crime of Complicity:”

“Sometimes moral analysis works best by being abstract and detached from reality. Other times, though, it benefits from intense engagement with its subject matter. Amos Guiora's writing on the conundrums of complicity and the requirement that bystanders and passersby intervene to prevent evil is writing of the latter kind. It is detailed, thoughtful, erudite and intensely engaged … quite unlike anything else I have read on this issue.” — Jeremy Waldron, professor of law, New York University

“It is very difficult to find the right words to describe the horror portrayed in this book. But Amos Guiora has done this, and he has done this very well. Highly recommended.” — Paul Cliteur, professor of jurisprudence, Leiden University, the Netherlands, and author of “The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law”

"Amos Guiora's ‘The Crime of Complicity’ should make any bystander who sees violence against another and chooses to do nothing about it shudder. He recounts in depth the suffering of his family in Death Marches and concentration camp agony, watched by Eastern Europeans who looked the other way, to campus rape watchers who did nothing. … (he) argues that those who watch violence have a greater duty not to remain silent and that legislation imposing that duty to protect the innocent might be necessary.” — Avery Friedman, CNN legal analyst

Editor’s note: Author interviews and review copies of this book are available by emailing Dean Pappas at Dean.Pappas@americanbar.org. If you publish a review of this book, please send tear sheets or a copy for our files to Dean Pappas, ABA Book Publishing, 321 N. Clark St., Chicago, IL 60654.

With more than 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is one of the largest voluntary professional membership organizations in the world. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law. View our privacy statement online. Follow the latest ABA news at www.americanbar.org/news and on Twitter @ABANews.