The Transformation and Search for Understanding at the Beginning of This Journey
At the end of my first year practicing law, a week with cancer patients/survivors (all women) and dolphins changed everything, including my life and practice. The women dealing with their mortality with strength, courage, and dignity humbled me and changed my perspective. The dolphins, including one named “Little Bit”—the last surviving Flipper from the 1960s movie I watched as a child—inspired me, and I fell in love with her. This experience led to pro bono, reduced fee work, and eventually, a national and international practice.
Upon returning home from this life-changing experience, I immediately started studying animal rights literature to understand why some would have a different take on it—even after it produced decades of work for animals. That study continues, and as Michelangelo stated, “I am still learning.” This quest for understanding has featured grappling with all kinds of ethical issues—sometimes in the abstract, daily in legal practice.
Essential Things for All Lawyers Handling Matters Involving Animals
Though it may not get the attention and love it deserves, Model Rule of Professional Responsibility 2.1, Advisor, provides aspirational and real-world guidance for lawyers and a gateway to addressing animal interests, protection, and well-being. Rule 2.1 states:
In representing a client, a lawyer shall exercise independent professional judgment and render candid advice. In rendering advice, a lawyer may refer not only to law but to other considerations, such as moral, economic, social, psychological, and political factors that may be relevant to the client’s situation.
In short, properly advising one’s client involves (1) independent professional judgment (i.e., free of conflicts including one’s interests or views, see Rule 1.7) and (2) candid advice (competent, sufficient knowledge and understanding, see Rule 1.1). Significantly, the lawyer may render advice referencing the law and “other considerations such as moral, economic, social and political factors that may be relevant to the client’s situation.”
Because of the evolving public consciousness and concern about animals generally (and some more than others—compare companion and farmed or fished animals), extra-legal considerations are often relevant and sometimes critical. This is especially true when one is engaged in a high-profile matter where a client or stakeholder may depend upon the public’s goodwill and trust.
A Good Framework of Understanding for “Doing Good”
The thoughtful examination and resolution (to the extent possible) of the ethical considerations relevant within the practice of animal law and for use by all lawyers involved in any legal matters involving animals also aid in reviewing social, cultural, psychological, and political factors. Here are the different levels of ethical consideration:
- The big ethical question(s) regarding our relationships with nonhuman animals
- Responsible and ethical governance of animal-related organizations
- Characteristics of enlightened organizations
- Daily good practices
- Unique micro-level situations with ethical challenges (e.g., whole life, end of life)
- Professional ethics governing various animal-related areas of endeavor
- Legal ethics: our responsibilities as members of this noble, service profession
Comprehensive awareness of ethical considerations and appropriate application in a given situation makes us and our work better, and that is good. It is also essential to uphold our ethical and professional responsibilities.
Doing Good the Right Way
Any lawyer handling a matter involving an animal can use this framework to protect themselves and their clients by expanding their awareness. It is good practice for doing good the right way and addressing animal interests, protection, and well-being competently, ethically, and professionally.