In 2022, The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) was the subject of ad nauseum discussion by business owners, CPAs, attorneys, and other tax practitioners who were mostly bemoaning its passage and implementation, as well as debating the pros and cons of what the Corporate Transparency Act meant for them and their clients. In September 2022, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued Final Rules for how and when businesses must comply with the CTA.
I. What and Why
At its core, the CTA is a mechanism to deal with issues related to “dirty money”—i.e., guarding against money laundering, terrorism financing, and other forms of illegal financing—as well as the general lack of beneficial owner (i.e., “true owner”) information with respect to many domestic entity structures. The United States has not scored well with the Foreign Action Task Force (FATF) set up by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to grade countries on whether they have adequate disclosure of beneficial ownership information with respect to structures created in their jurisdictions. OECD is a forum where democratic governments of countries with market-based economies collaborate to collect and compare data and conduct analysis to inform and develop economic, social, and environmental policies. The FATF and OECD’s activities show that minimum levels of transparency concerning the beneficial owners of legal persons and arrangements are required for tax as well as for anti‑money laundering purposes. Jurisdictions which implement these higher international transparency standards, including beneficial ownership information disclosure rules, preclude a good portion of the aforementioned criminal activities.
In recent years, transparency and accountability initiatives have increased in both private and government sectors. This is in part a result of media exposure of governance practices and governmental and organizational leaders’ withholding of information: stakeholders feel they have been taken advantage of or blindsided by unfortunate events, revealing the need for tools to ensure transparency and accountability. It comes as no surprise that beneficial ownership transparency is increasingly recognized as an integral element of anti-corruption and tax justice efforts. Progress has been made with respect to some financial crimes, but alternative legal persons and arrangements are still frequently used in the U.S. to hide beneficial owners of assets. Transparency of beneficial ownership plays a key part in tax transparency and the fight against tax evasion, the integrity of the financial sector, and law enforcement efforts.
Tax evasion, corruption and moneylaundering are crimes made easier through the misuse of legal entities such as corporations, foundations, partnerships, and trusts. With the use of complicated chains of ownership of legal persons and arrangements across many jurisdictions, the identity of the beneficial owners of assets (including financial assets), the true purposes of the assets, and/or the origin of the funds or assets can be hidden. By design, the use of nominee shareholders or directors, or entities such as trusts, shell companies, inactive companies or similar structures strengthens the anonymity of beneficial owners. Ultimately, the identity of the beneficial owner(s) is concealed from tax authorities and other law enforcement agencies.
The CTA was born of the view that the availability of beneficial ownership information is a crucial tool in the fight against tax evasion, money laundering, corruption, terrorist financing and other financial crimes. From a tax perspective, knowing the identity of the natural persons behind entities not only helps a jurisdiction such as the U.S. preserve the integrity of its own tax system, but also provides the U.S.’s global treaty partners a means to better achieve their own tax goals.
II. Enactment and Implementation
The CTA was enacted January 1, 2021 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, representing the most significant reformation of the Bank Secrecy Act and related anti-money laundering rules since the U.S. Patriot Act. CTA is expected to blaze a trail for FinCEN to develop a system of standardized reporting of companies being formed in the US and the disclosure of their beneficial ownership information. FinCEN is a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department that collects and analyzes information about financial transactions to combat domestic and international money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes. Tax practitioners will need to understand the compliance and reporting obligations under the CTA that are reported to FinCEN.
It took almost a year following CTA’s enactment before issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking on December 7, 2021, and it was almost another year before those proposed rules were published on September 30, 2022. Practitioners need to prepare themselves and their clients for the rules on reporting, what types of entities the rules apply to, what information is needed and the time deadlines for the reporting.
III. General Components and Requirements
A. CTA Reporting Companies
The CTA requires “reporting companies” to file with FinCEN reports that identify a company’s beneficial owners, as well as to report information about company applicants. The CTA applies to entities either created through a U.S. state filing or formed under the law of a foreign country and registered to do business in the U.S. That is, the primary requirement for an entity to be classified as a reporting company is the filing of a document with the applicable state jurisdiction to form the entity. For example, LLCs, LLPs, partnerships, corporations, and business statutory trusts are entities for which laws in each state require the filing of a document with the applicable state office to establish their existence.
There are, however, many exceptions to the definition of a reporting company. The regulations make it clear that entities or de facto entities that are created without the need for a state or jurisdictional document filing such as revocable living trusts, irrevocable trusts, sole proprietorships, and general partnerships are excluded from the definition of reporting companies and do not have to report beneficial owners to FinCEN. Categorical exemptions are established for certain other entities including banks or bank holding companies; federal or state credit unions; government entities; entities having publicly traded securities or that are otherwise registered with regular reporting requirements to FinCEN, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) or the Securities & Exchange Commission; insurance companies; public accounting firms; public utilities; section 501(c) recognized tax-exempt entities; and tax-exempt political organizations. Qualified reporting exemptions are also established for large operating companies, which must have a physical office in the U.S., more than 20 U.S.-based full-time employees, and more than $5 million in gross receipts or sales in the U.S. as reported on prior year federal income tax returns.
B. CTA Beneficial Owners and Company Applicants
Once a reporting company is identified, the practitioner must take a deeper dive into the company records to determine beneficial owners, defined based on a percentage of ownership or control. The party that is obligated to report requested information on the beneficial owners is the company itself, which is typically accomplished as a duty of one or more of the company officers. The term “beneficial owner” is defined as including the following: (i) people with substantial control, (ii) people with ownership interests, whether indirect or direct, equally at least 25% of the company’s equity interests, and (iii) company applicants. An owner in the CTA context is broadly defined: if the reporting company is owned by another company, the reporting company must look through the parent company to the human being that owns the parent company because CTA requires that a beneficial owner must be a natural person/human being.
The test for “substantial control” is a facts and circumstances analysis: (i) whether the person has the ability to merge or dissolve the company or (ii) whether the person controls major expenditures, the selection of business lines, compensation schemes, or entry into contracts; or other decisions of a similar nature. An individual with either of those powers to merge/dissolve or control will be treated as a beneficial owner for CTA reporting, whether or not that person has an ownership interest. An example of a person with substantial control is an officer or director of the reporting company.
The second test applies to parties who are direct or indirect owners of a quarter interest in the reporting company. This covers joint ownership, direct ownership of shares of stock, or ownership of a membership interest.
The third test covers the applicant that filed a formation document with the entity’s jurisdictional office to establish its existence. A company is obligated to report information on any person who signed a certificate of formation, a certificate of incorporation, or another document similar in nature as a beneficial owner.