chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.
    Group and Committee Calls

    Pfoser v. Harpstead and the Implications on the Practice of Elder Law

    Pfoser v. Harpstead and the Implications on the Practice of Elder Law

    Pfoser v. Harpstead and the Implications on the Practice of Elder Law

    (Source: Getty Images)

    Elder Law and Special Needs Planning Group (TE)

    Pfoser v. Harpstead: The Implications on the Practice of Elder Law

    Recorded on December 21, 2021

    Laurie Hanson, Esq. gave a presentation on Pfoser v. Harpstead, which is a Minnesota Supreme Court case involving a person over 65 funding a pooled trust subaccount and whether that is an uncompensated transfer for Medicaid eligibility purposes. Specifically, Ms. Hanson covered:

    1. Basic Medicaid and SSI Eligibility
    2. Pfoser Holding: Funding a pooled trust subaccount is not an uncompensated transfer
    3. The Pfoser Court on Fair Market Value, Adequate Consideration, and compensated transfers
    4. Minnesota’s Department of Human Services treatment of pooled trusts afterwards
    5. Appeals, Litigation, and Legislative and Administrative Advocacy

    The content of this program does not meet requirements for continuing legal education (CLE) accreditation. You will not receive CLE credit for for this program or any Professors’ Corner programs.

    This content is for Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Section members only. Please login now to view recordings. If you are not a member of the RPTE Section don’t worry, it’s easy to Join Now!  Learn more about the RPTE Section member benefits