Origins of Democracy: Ancient Greece and Medieval England
Governance by democracy, or the active participation of citizens in self-rule, originated in ancient Athens. Indeed, our word ‘democracy’ stems from the Greek for people (demos) and rule (kratos). Democracy in ancient Athens was not inclusive, but limited to free men who were citizens of Athens; women, slaves, children, and non-citizens had no vote. However, those who could vote were required to, and it was a direct democracy. Furthermore, the Athenians established The Council of Five Hundred (boule), in which 500 citizens were elected annually to serve in the government making laws and regulating the city-state. The Council would pay participants a modest sum, and serving was considered an ordinary part of life—not something just reserved for the politically ambitious. Failure to serve when elected in this direct form of democracy could attract fines or public shame.
Athenian democracy was unknown in medieval England. The monarchs in England had restraints on their rule until a baronial revolt during the inept and rapacious reign of King John (1199-1216) eventually led to increased self-governance by some free men in English society. Self-governance in medieval England expanded in the thirteenth century through several factors: (1) restraints on the actions and traditional revenues of the monarch (Magna Carta); (2) the tradition—started in 1225—that taxes levied by the crown had to be approved by the upper classes of society; (3) the inclusion of lower classes—the knights and burgesses—in governance by the usurper Simon de Montfort during his short rule of England in the 1260s, which many consider to be the first ‘parliament’; and (4) prevailing canon (church) law doctrines that ‘what touches all must be approved by all’. By the end of the reign of Edward I (1272-1307), parliament was established, bringing a representative form of self-government in which multiple social classes participated in law-making, taxation, and discussing state affairs. Parliament remained exclusive, however, with women, slaves, and serfs not participating.
With the rise of humanism in the 16th and 17th centuries, ancient Greek ideas of democracy began to inform the established English parliamentary democracy. Further, in the early 17th century Chief Justice Coke’s revivified interest in using his interpretation of Magna Carta as a shield against overreaching Stuart monarchs and as a tool for individual liberties was dominating the legal-political scene. Recurrent clashes between Parliament, the English law courts, and the monarch (who looked to France as a model of establishing an absolutist monarchy) eventually led to reforms in England’s form of representative Parliamentary democracy and the safeguarding of some individual liberties through the 1679 Habeas Corpus Act. The turbulent disputes of the 17th century would have been history that the American Founding Fathers knew well. These disputes about who should govern, what form that should take, and the importance of the individual would have directly informed their deliberations as they sought to establish a new nation.