Summary
Threats to election workers persist. Adequate solutions will require funding, legislation, and better coordination between federal, state, and local law enforcement.
Threats to election workers persist. Adequate solutions will require funding, legislation, and better coordination between federal, state, and local law enforcement.
Since 2020, election officials and workers have faced increased threats and harassment, leading many to resign or leave office. These threats, including death threats to officials in Nevada, Georgia, and Arizona, have targeted Democratic, Republican, and nonpartisan individuals alike.
Yet threats against election workers have led to few convictions. DOJ has established the Election Threats Task Force, but it has prosecuted very few of the more than one thousand cases it has reviewed. Support from local law enforcement has also generally proven underwhelming. Responses have included declining to investigate threats, sympathizing with claims of a “stolen election,” and recommending that a threat recipient purchase firearms for self-defense.
Other legislative and administrative barriers persist. A bipartisan effort seeking to reform the Electoral Count Act to double federal penalties for threatening or intimidating election officials, meanwhile, remains stuck in the Senate. While the federal government has clarified that HAVA and Byrne JAG funding can be used for improvements to election worker safety (such as physical security services and social media threat monitoring), any individual precinct’s funding increase is likely to be small. In addition, receiving any funding will require both that state officials allocate sufficient funding to threatened localities and that local officials prioritize election worker safety over other spending priorities.
Meanwhile, a concerning effort seeks to recruit and install partisan operatives and election deniers in positions of control, where they may more easily tamper with voting equipment or otherwise disrupt proper election procedures.