chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.
July 10, 2024 ABA Task Force for American Democracy

More U.S. Locations Experimenting with Alternative Voting Systems

Drew DeSilver, Carrie Blazina, Janakee Chavda & Rebecca Leppert, Pew Research Center, June 19, 2021

Summary

Over 261 jurisdictions have adopted a voting method other than winner-take-all, including states, counties, cities, and school boards. This is the result of a recent uptick in adoption of such methods (mostly ranked-choice or single-transferable vote), driven largely by popular pressure and voter initiatives. New York City used ranked-choice voting in its 2021 Democratic mayoral primary election (which, as the determinative election for NYC mayor, was a fairly high-profile example). Maine uses RCV extensively, including in elections for federal offices, while Washington, California, and Alaska have all adopted some version of the “top-two” primary.

A range of other voting methods have been used throughout U.S. history. Until the 1840s, states generally held at-large rather than districted elections for Congress. From 1870 to 1980, the Illinois House of Representatives was elected by cumulative voting. Connecticut and Pennsylvania, meanwhile, still use limited voting (i.e., voters get fewer votes than the total number seats)  to protect minority interests in certain state offices.

Key Findings

Voting Systems in the U.S.

Types of voting systems, based on how the general election winner or winners are chosen

Plurality

  • First-past-the-post/"winner-takes-all": Candidate with the most votes wins, even if less than a majority      
  • At-large: Same as first-past-the-post except with multiple winners
  • Approval voting: Voters can "approve" as many candidates as they like; candidte with msot approvals is winner

Majoritarian

  • Top-two: All candidates run against each other in first round; top two finishers meet in second round; a top-four version can also be used
  • Ranked-choice voting: Voters rank candidates by preference; if no candidate gets majority, rankings are used to reallocate losers' votes til one does

Proportional

  • Single transferable vote: Voters rank candidates; once candidates receive a predetermined quota of votes, rankings are used to allocate seats either at large or in multi-member districts

Semi-Proportional

  • Cumulative voting: Voters have as may votes as there are positions to fill and can distribute them among candidates however they wish
  • Limited voting: Voters have fewer votes than there are positions to fill
  • Single non-transferable vote: Voters have just one vote and there are multiple seats to be filled