June Medical Services LLC v. Gee & Gee v. June Medical Services LLC
Does Louisiana’s law that requires doctors who perform abortions to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital violate the right to an abortion?
Using PREVIEW in the Classroom
Current cases before the Court are featured each month along a with modified case study and focus questions for classroom use.
Featured Case
McGirt v. Oklahoma
Do Oklahoma courts have criminal jurisdiction over certain crimes committed on disputed Indian land that are normally under federal jurisdiction?
View - CaseSign up for alerts
Sign up for our Preview in the Classroom alerts and receive a notification when a new case study is posted!
2019-2020
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
Did the Montana Supreme Court violate the Constitution when it struck down a state program that offered Montanans dollar-for-dollar tax credits for donations to private schools, including religious schools, for the purpose of paying student tuition?
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, New York
Does a New York City law which bans the transportation of a licensed, locked, and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits, violate the Second Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the constitutional right to travel?
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
In 2012, during the Obama Administration, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA). Through the program the government granted a temporary, but renewable, pardon from deportation to young people who were present in the United States without authorization and who met specified criteria. In 2017, the Trump Administration withdrew DACA arguing that it lacked authority to maintain DACA because the executive branch had illegally overstepped its power when it first started the program in 2012.
Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda (Consolidated)
Did employers violate Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination “because of sex” when they fired employees because of the employees’ sexual orientation?
R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. EEOC
Does discrimination against an employee because of the employee’s transgender status violate the prohibition on employment discrimination “because of sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Past Cases
2019-2020 | Volume 47
Review the 2019-2020 Supreme Court’s argument sessions modified case study and focus questions for classroom use.
2018-2019
Review the 2018-2019 Supreme Court’s argument sessions modified case study and focus questions for classroom use.