The SEC promulgated Rule 10b5-1 in October 2000 to resolve an unsettled issue over the definition of insider trading which is prohibited by SEC Rule 10b-5. By way of background, the SEC adopted Rule 10b5-1 to permit corporate insiders, who regularly possess material non-public information (MNPI), to sell their company shares without the risk of claims of insider trading. Pursuant to the Rule 10b5-1 safe harbor, a corporate insider can establish a trading plan specifying pre-established dates for determining when the insider can sell shares without the risk of insider trading. To be valid, the plan must, among other things, be executed while the insider is not in possession of MNPI and be implemented in good faith. If such a plan is validly established, an insider who subsequently transacts pursuant to that plan is permitted an affirmative defense to insider trading allegations.
A trio of 2021 events shined a spotlight on SEC Rule 10b5-1 plans:
- On January 19, 2021, a Stanford University published a study, titled “Gaming the System; Three ‘Red Flags’ of Potential 10b5-1 Abuse,” in which the authors presented “new evidence” on the trading behavior of corporate executives using a unique dataset of over 20,000 10b5-1 plans. The study showed “that a subset of executives use 10b5-1 plans to engage in opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”
- On June 7, 2021, in remarks before the Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network Summit, SEC Chair Gary Gensler identified plans to “freshen up” Rule 10b5-1 in response to “cracks in our insider trading regime”—citing the Stanford study—and outlined several areas of focus for the SEC regarding executive stock ownership and the means by which insiders sell shares in the companies with which they’re affiliated while in possession of material information that the public doesn’t have.
- On June 24, 2021, U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Deb Fischer reintroduced their bipartisan Promoting Transparent Standards for Corporate Insiders Act to bring greater transparency to corporate stock trading. If enacted, the bipartisan bill would require the SEC to study the issue of insider trading, report their findings to Congress, and write additional rules restricting an insider’s ability to take advantage of the system.