chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.

ARTICLE

The Ethics of Negotiation in Mediation

Eshigo Philomena Okasili

Summary

  • When one side fails to disclose valuable information that a reasonable person would rely upon in deciding whether to settle a dispute, the result can be a violation of the ethics rules.
  • There are a number of rules that deal with honesty and that come into play during mediation.
  • While lawyers are bound by the ethics rules regarding honesty, clients have no such guardrails.
  • By holding back discoverable information during mediation in the hopes of gaining an advantage, you risk violating the ethics rules regarding honesty and misrepresentation and may even put the client’s settlement agreement in jeopardy.
The Ethics of Negotiation in Mediation
Andrii Yalanskyi via Getty Images

Most lawyers who participate in mediation do so in good faith ready to engage in “honest dealing.” Spending even a half day with the client and a mediator can help identify contested issues and possible solutions through agreement between the parties. However, when one side fails to disclose valuable information that a reasonable person would rely upon in deciding whether to settle a dispute, the result can be not just a failed mediation but a violation of the ethics rules.

The Rules Governing Honest Dealings in Negotiation

The preamble to the ABA Model Rules addresses a lawyer’s role during negotiation and reminds us that that, when acting in the role of negotiator, “a lawyer seeks a result advantageous to the client but consistent with requirements of honest dealings with others.” This is in contrast to a lawyer’s role as an advocate in which we are charged with zealously asserting the client's position under the rules of the adversary system.

There are a number of rules that deal with honesty and that come into play during mediation. These rules have been adopted in some form in every jurisdiction.

ABA Model Rule 4.1 makes it a violation to “knowingly (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person or to (b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client. Comment 2 to Rule 4.1 reminds us that in negotiation, “certain types of statements ordinarily are not taken as statements of material fact” but cautions that what is regarded as “fact” depends on the circumstances and so lawyers should exercise caution to avoid criminal or tortious misrepresentation during negotiations.

A mediator who is also a lawyer has duties as well under ABA Model Rule 8.3. Questions about whether the mediator has a duty to report lawyer misconduct under this rule could arise if the mediator believes that the lawyer for one of the parties is making false statements that fall outside the ordinary conventions of negotiation. For a discussion of acceptable hyperbole or posturing in negotiation, see ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 06-439.

ABA Model Rule 3.3, which prohibits lawyers from knowingly making untrue statements of fact to a tribunal, is generally inapplicable to mediation, but does apply when the tribunal itself is participating in settlement negotiations. This would include court-sponsored mediation in which a judge participates. For more information on duties during court-sponsored mediation, see ABA Formal Opinion 93-370.

Talk to Your Client about Honest Disclosure

While lawyers are bound by the ethics rules regarding honesty, clients have no such guardrails to guide them. Consider including a provision in your fee agreement that warns the client of the possible consequences of knowingly misrepresenting, falsifying or withholding material facts in discovery. Once the client learns that honest dealings are not just about their lawyer’s professional responsibility but that the client may suffer consequences such as sanctions, loss of their claims, a desirable settlement, or withdrawal of their lawyer if the client knowingly withholds material facts, even the most reluctant client may be convinced of the importance of full disclosure to their lawyer.

Including a paragraph about the duties and responsibilities regarding honesty and good faith in the fee agreement also makes it difficult for clients to later claim they did not know they could not lie about the facts or that there could be negative consequences if they did.

Mediate with Confidence and Honesty

It may be tempting to hold back discoverable information during mediation in the hopes of gaining an advantage. However, depending on the circumstances, by doing so, you risk violating the ethics rules regarding honesty and misrepresentation and may even put the client’s settlement agreement in jeopardy. Knowing and adhering to the ethics rules and opinions regarding honest dealings with others is the best way to confidently—and ethically—represent the client’s best interests in mediation.

    Author