I Was a Watergate Special Prosecutor
It was a heady experience to be part of an extraordinary group working to uncover facts and secure justice.
Volume 51, Issue 2
It was a heady experience to be part of an extraordinary group working to uncover facts and secure justice.
Even this brief review shows what it has meant to constitutional jurisprudence to have a solid conservative majority for over a half century.
You must roll up your sleeves, you must be disciplined and focused, and you must try cases—and not just a few.
Efficient discovery begins with an understanding of how relevant records were kept, before any collection takes place.
Our approach to evidence is mostly sound, but some problems have proven deeply embedded and cannot be addressed without creating wreckage.
The cases in this article demonstrate that drawing a line between creativity and copyright infringement is a challenge—in particular, drawing it in a way that will yield consistent results.
AI’s true impact may lie in the future, by freeing us to focus on strategic thinking, client counseling, and creative problem-solving.
This is a story about a pendulum swinging between wide judicial discretion and severe limits on that discretion.
The 1979 trial of Ted Bundy was the first to be nationally televised, while the Covid pandemic forever changed the perception of the efficacy of remote depositions, mediations, and judicial proceedin…
History teaches us that the constitutional appointment system is fallible; it leads to appointments driven by political considerations.
The U.S. Constitution does not set out anyone’s rights and is primarily a statement of procedures. It is a rather clear expression of the “natural rights” theory of liberal democratic theorists such…
The founders of Litigation taught us to value the expertise of those who try the slip-and-falls, the fender-benders that often clog our courts.