September 01, 2013

Contrasting U.S. Litigation and International Arbitration

Among the differences: in most international arbitrations, parties and their counsel are required to commit firmly and early to the facts they expect to prove.

Oleg Rivkin

 Download a printable PDF of this article (membership required).

American litigators know that there is often a tortuous road between the filing of the complaint and trial. The parties’ positions, and how each side views the facts, tend to evolve through the initial pleadings, amended pleadings, motions to dismiss, documentary discovery, depositions, summary judgment motions, pretrial submissions, motions in limine, pretrial statements, trial briefs, and the course of trial itself. It is often not until after discovery is completed and summary judgment motions are decided that lawyers and their clients decide what facts they will actually try to prove at trial. And even then, they strive to preserve flexibility to respond to what occurs immediately prior to and during trial.

Premium Content For:
  • Litigation Section
Join - Now