Confusion over Preliminary Injunction Standard Clarified, but Not Settled

A district court considering an interlocutory motion for preliminary injunction need not consider all four traditional elements to conclude that a movant has satisfied the standard. Instead, a trial court must consider two of the four elements—the probability of success and irreparable injury elements. While some ABA Section of Litigation leaders believe the Reilly v. City of Harrisburg holding is narrow and limited to First Amendment cases, others say that, because federal courts are divided, the decision should prompt practitioners to be mindful of the specific standard in their jurisdiction.

Premium Content for:

  • ABA Section of Litigation Members
Join Now

Already a member? Log In


Copyright © 2017, American Bar Association. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the American Bar Association, the Section of Litigation, this committee, or the employer(s) of the author(s).

Advertisement

  • Content Archive

  • More Information

  • Connect with us!