In 2010, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 was amended to require full expert reports and other disclosures for retained expert witnesses, but only summaries of anticipated opinion testimony of non-retained experts. During the ensuing nine years, courts have weighed in on the distinctions between retained experts and non-retained experts. Even still, the distinctions are murky.
January 16, 2020 Articles
Expert Disclosures: Navigating the Distinction Between Retained and Non-Retained Experts
Courts have weighed in on the distinctions between retained experts and non-retained experts. Even still, the distinctions are murky.
By David L. Johnson
Premium Content For:
- Litigation Section