chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.
February 25, 2015 Practice Points

Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Reporting Threshold Increased to $76.3 Million

Effective February 20, 2015, transactions over $76.3 million must be reported to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the Agencies) at least 30 days prior to closing

Matthew C. Hans – February 25, 2015

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) requires that transactions over a certain value be reported to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the Agencies) at least 30 days prior to closing. See generally, 15 U.S.C. § 18a. That reporting threshold is adjusted annually. Effective February 20, 2015, the new threshold is $76.3 million (up from $75.9 million in 2014). Parties to transactions should consult with antitrust counsel if they are acquiring or selling voting securities, non-corporate interests in a business (such as interests in an LLC or partnership), or assets valued over $76.3 million.

When determining whether an HSR filing is necessary, the following questions usually must be addressed:

What is the value of the transaction?
The HSR rules are complex and many times whether the size-of-the-transaction threshold is met turns on the details of the transaction's structure and whether any HSR exemptions apply.

If the transaction exceeds the $76.3 million threshold, are the parties large enough?
If the transaction is valued at or above $76.3 million but less than $305.1 million, then the size of the parties is considered. If one party to the deal (and all of that party's parents, affiliates, and subsidiaries) has sales or assets over $152.5 million dollars, and if the other party has sales or assets over $15.3 million, then the transaction might be reportable. All non-exempt transactions valued over $305.1 million are reportable, regardless of the size of the parties.

Do any exemptions apply?
The HSR rules contain several exemptions which can reduce the transaction value, or eliminate the obligation to make a filing altogether. For instance, the HSR rules do not apply to certain acquisitions of non-U.S. entities or assets, acquisitions made solely for the purpose of investment, or certain real estate acquisitions.

What will the FTC or Antitrust Division do after the filing is made?
This is the last and perhaps most critical question. The filing triggers a 30-day waiting period during which the parties cannot close the transaction. The waiting period gives the Agencies an opportunity to review whether the transaction could harm or diminish competition in the market for any particular product or service. Upon request of the parties, the Agencies may terminate the waiting period earlier than 30 days, if the transaction has no risk of decreasing competition. Early termination is fairly common when the parties do not compete against one another. But if the parties do compete or operate in the same market or industry, antitrust counsel should be consulted early in the process to determine how the transaction might affect competition and the likelihood the Agencies will oppose or challenge the transaction.

Ignoring the HSR threshold can be costly. Failure to file a required HSR notification can draw penalties up to $16,000 for each day of noncompliance. Keep the number $76.3 million in mind as you negotiate and structure any transaction in 2015. Further questions on how the HRS threshold adjustment may affect transactions in 2015 should be directed to antitrust counsel.

Keywords: litigation, antitrust, commercial and business, Hart-Scott-Rodino, reporting threshold

Matthew C. Hans is with Polsinelli, LLP, in St. Louis, Missouri.

Copyright © 2016, American Bar Association. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the American Bar Association, the Section of Litigation, this committee, or the employer(s) of the author(s).