Miller v. Mitsubishi Digital Elec. Am. Inc. (In re Tweeter OPCO), 452 B.R.150 (Bankr. D. Del. June 14, 2011), is an instructive recent case on pleading preference claims. The case evidences the importance of providing factual allegations in the complaint to support these claims or risk having to respond to a motion to dismiss and potential dismissal of the complaint.
October 17, 2011 Articles
Lessons Learned on Preference Pleading Requirements to Satisfy Twombly and Iqbal
Miller v. Mitsubishi proves the importance of providing factual allegations in the complaint to support pleading preference claims.
By James P. Menton Jr.
Premium Content For:
- Litigation Section