September 03, 2014 Practice Points

Forum-Selection Clause Supersedes Right to FINRA Arbitration

By Amanda M.H. Wolfman

In Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Golden Empire Schools Financing Authority, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 4099289, at *1 (2d Cir. Aug. 21, 2014), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that “a forum selection clause requiring ‘all actions and proceedings’ to be brought in federal court supersedes an earlier agreement to arbitrate”—even when the earlier agreement to arbitrate is set forth in the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). By so holding, the Second Circuit agreed with the holding of the Ninth Circuit in Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. City of Reno, 747 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2014), and rejected that of the Fourth Circuit in UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. Carilion Clinic, 706 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2013).

Read the full case note.

Keywords: litigation, ADR, alternative dispute resolution, arbitrability, FINRA, forum selection clause

Amanda M.H. Wolfman is with Novack and Macey LLP in Chicago, Illinois.


Copyright © 2016, American Bar Association. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the American Bar Association, the Section of Litigation, this committee, or the employer(s) of the author(s).