Summary
- The post-COVID debate about in-office versus remote work continues to evolve.
- Reviewing the key considerations for each will help firms to make better decisions.
- Firms ignoring workplace changes will find themselves at a disadvantage.
The debate over whether law firms should prioritize office-based work or allow associates and paralegals to work from home has intensified in the post-pandemic era. We have different thoughts and perspectives on this tug-of-war, and what it means for the future of law. So, in this column we explore both sides of the issue, considering key business metrics, potential impacts and examples to provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
In analyzing the issue, there are several key considerations that we’ll look at from both perspectives—in-office and remote:
While office-based work provides immediate feedback and reduces distractions (or not), remote work's flexibility and technological support can also sustain productivity. The choice depends on the firm's culture and specific needs.
A 2022 survey by the American Bar Association found that 44 percent of lawyers with less than 10 years of practice would consider leaving their current positions for more remote work opportunities. Yet only 19 percent of lawyers with over 30 years of experience said they would leave their firms for a greater ability to work remotely.
While in-office work strengthens firm culture and networking, remote work can attract and retain top talent by offering flexibility. A balanced approach might be necessary to meet diverse needs.
Law firms using hybrid models have managed to reduce office space requirements by reducing each office or work area and increasing the density of workers per square foot, sometimes by hoteling, where workspaces are assigned for use on an as-needed basis.
Remote work offers potential cost savings by drastically reducing the need for office space. However, these savings may be reduced by the costs of periodical in-person meetings especially for employees who live outside the normal commuting area.
During the pandemic, most law firms successfully adapted to remote work, maintaining client relationships through virtual meetings and digital communication tools.
Fewer clients are coming into their lawyers’ office post-pandemic, so while in-office work supports face-to-face client interactions, remote work's flexibility and virtual communication capabilities can still meet client needs and expectations effectively.
Firms using hybrid models have successfully maintained team dynamics by strategically scheduling in-office days for collaboration and training. Remote firms must be creative to build or maintain firm culture. It will take a series of intentional efforts to stimulate team dynamics, including staff meetings and events and activities that both teach and facilitate collaboration. It seems lawyers and staff at smaller law offices in smaller communities have more readily and willingly returned to more of an in-office model, or at least more days per week in the office than some of their colleagues in bigger firms in larger centers.
And the winner is . . . a custom approach that fits your staff, office and culture. What fits and is working today is likely to change as we move forward. The marketplace continues to evolve. Technology continues to evolve. Client expectations, employee attitudes and the labor market all continue to evolve. So, law firms must pay close attention and evolve with these changes. That will involve compromises with the two camps. Those compromises will have to be revisited as things change, so don’t let your expectations become set in stone.
We see an approach that does the most to benefit the firm:
By considering these factors and adopting a balanced approach, law firms can create a work environment that maximizes productivity, attracts top talent and meets client expectations while maintaining a strong firm culture.