Where can we expect law and policy regarding national security surveillance to go in the coming years? Where should it go? This week's episode features an expert panel from our CLE conference this past February. The panel gives greater context to these questions, set against growing domestic national security threats from militias, American political extremists, controversies about surveillance that have left several FISA authorities lapsed; and questions about the renewal of Sec. 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.
To hear the entirety of this panel discussion, please visit our website
This panel is moderated by Dakota Rudesill, Associate Professor of Law at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Adam Klein is the Director of the Strauss Center’s Program on Technology, Security, and Global Affairs
Carrie Cordero is General Counsel at The Center for a New American Security
Emily Berman is an Associate Professor at The University of Houston Law Center:
References:
Register for the 32nd Annual Review of the Field of National Security Law Conference – The Past, Present and Future: Celebrating 60 Years of the Standing Committee on Law and National Security : November 17-18, 2022.
Katz v. United States (1967)
Title III, The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (The Wiretap Act)
United States v. U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Michigan, 1972 (The Keith Case)
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA)
An Anthology: 60 Years of Transformation | National Security Law
The New U.S. Intelligence Community Law Sourcebook, 2021-2022 Edition – 25% OFF with code: ICLS25