The PDF in which this article appears can be found in Bifocal Vol. 44; Issue 3.
Older adults need to be included in advocacy on climate change as many are interested and adversely impacted by this issue. Age is one of the first things we observe about someone. When we associate someone’s age with distinct life experiences and behaviors, we are imagining who the person is in relation to specific cultures and capacities. Therefore aging, a highly individual experience, is oftentimes understood through socially constructed generalizations surrounding what older persons know and practice. Several of these impressions are grounded in negative, narrow attitudes that are frequently paired with aging in society. As they are adopted, the order of our humanity is influenced by age-discrimination. This mode of inequity is best described as “ageism”: the imposition of stereotypes and prejudices against a generation.
The older adult population is susceptible to ageism as older persons often experience high rates of cognitive impairment, illness, risk-taking behaviors, healthcare spending, incarceration, poverty, and other adverse conditions that impair their functional abilities. Between these issues and other costs of aging, younger generations and older adults themselves tend to devalue people of older ages, perceiving them as too incapacitated and disconnected from reality to provide any credible contributions to the world. In fact, 1 in 2 people are ageist against older people. While they are already prone to an abundance of wellness and financial challenges in the aging process, older persons are vulnerable to the marginalization that results from the spread of ageism as their identities and needs are shut out of critical movements for change.
Because older adults endure inordinate rates of ageism, they are often denied representation in modern climate reform initiatives. Often portrayed in mass media as the generation that behaves complacently in the face of global warming, lawmakers frequently exclude older adults from legal action designed to address climate change by targeting younger adults as the central audience for their policy interventions and dismissing older persons' perspectives on environmental justice. Therefore, media outlets and legislators tend to display the deterioration of the climate as a conflict for younger generations to resolve, not a matter for older individuals to voice their demands, apply their expertise, or participate in policy making. This discriminatory angle of coverage on the issue rejects the ultimate truth that older persons are stakeholders in climate reform, especially as older adults constitute large percentages of people who are limited in their capacity to cope with extreme climate variability.
Changes in our bodies as we age can make it more difficult for older adults to cope with heat, or resist vector-borne diseases. Prolonged disasters can damage the physical and mental health of older adults. Additionally, older adults who are experiencing neurocognitive decline may experience disorientation and distress following climate extremes. Extreme weather events can result in a change in displacement from medical care or equipment and personal items. When weather events result in a change in living arrangements it can result in “transfer trauma” and negative health outcomes and feelings of helplessness.
As climate disasters pose life altering threats against the health and welfare of all, the impacts of them are felt differently by diverse groups of people. Families with young children may be displaced from day-care, schools, and social activities. Working adults often experience a loss of earnings. And older adults may face health risks because of the extreme climate events.