On January 2, 2025, the “Dole Act,” officially named the Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act, was signed into law. The Dole Act brought significant changes to several laws affecting veterans and service members. Among these changes included amendments to the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”).
Since its inception, USERRA has been the primary protection for veterans and service members from employment discrimination based on military obligations or deployments. The goal of the Dole Act for USERRA claims was to modernize USERRA protections by increasing accountability, broadening its applicability, and providing more liquidated damages to redress harm in successful USERRA claims.
Prior to the Dole Act, there was confusion about whether USERRA applied to regular uniformed service members in active duty. The elimination of the “noncareer service” has clarified that USERRA is applicable to those regular uniformed service members.
The Dole Act revises the landscape of USERRA law in a few notable ways. First, the Dole Act amends USERRA to broaden it from “noncareer service in the uniformed services” to “uniformed services.” The amendment makes USERRA applicable to all men and women who serve in uniform in a wide range of positions, such as the National Disaster Medical System or the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service. Moreover, the term “uniformed services” applies to active duty, active duty for training, initial active duty for training, inactive duty training, full-time National Guard duty, and state activity in response to a major disaster. The Dole Act further broadens USERRA by prohibiting various forms of retaliation from employers with the catch-all phrase “other retaliatory action.” The amendment will open up new challenges to employer actions that might not be discriminatory or adverse but are nonetheless retaliatory.
Prior to the Dole Act, courts could only address retaliatory actions that were discriminatory or adverse, meaning a material impact on one’s employment. However, after the Dole Act, “other retaliatory action” may broaden a court’s ability to redress retaliatory action that is not discriminatory or adverse, such as an exclusion from meetings or denial of training opportunities.