Addressing these concerns, the Thomson Reuters Institute Judicial Advisory Council assembled a judicial security panel “to better understand these threats and provide judicial personnel with tools to help protect themselves.” Judges and court personnel from across the country participated, and I had the honor of serving as moderator.
Sharing remarks first, Texas District Court Judge Julie Kocurek recounted being ambushed outside of her home in Austin, Texas. After a long recovery from multiple bullet wounds, Judge Kocurek leveraged this horrifying event for good by successfully advocating for the passage of a judicial security bill in her state. She also testified before the U.S. Senate in support of Senate Bill 3984, the Countering Threats and Attacks on our Judges Act.
“The bill will establish a State Judicial Threat Intelligence and Resource Center to provide technical assistance, training, and monitoring of threats for state and local judges and court personnel,” according to the National Center for State Courts, one of many sponsoring organizations. The bill was unanimously passed in the Senate and is now pending in the House.
Next to join the panel was Chief Judge Laura Beyer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Western District of North Carolina. She shared information acquired from serving on the U.S. Judicial Conference Committee on Judicial Security, delving more into the federal legislation and providing security insights.
The panel was rounded out by Chris Swecker, former FBI Assistant Director and current security consultant and media commentator. Swecker discussed security considerations for judges and judicial employees and provided practical home safety tips, including purchasing a home security system, owning a dog, alerting local law enforcement of the judge’s residence, training with pepper spray and firearms, eliminating hiding spots in the perimeter of the judge’s home, and reducing the dissemination of personally identifiable information online.
Overall, the panel was successful in shedding light on the emerging need for judicial security. Even more importantly, the audience was equipped with practical measures to avoid violence and heighten their own personal safety. In other words, judicial security efforts matter and may end up saving lives.