Traffic and driving cases are perhaps the most routine and among the most common interactions that the average person will have with a court proceeding. For that reason, traffic proceedings may become rote and, at times, even casual. But as several articles in this issue illustrate, there are some serious fundamental issues at stake in many of these proceedings that are worth a judge’s close attention.
Every judge is aware of the fundamental ethical requirement to perform judicial duties “competently and diligently” (ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct Rule 2.5(A)). However, it is all too easy to believe that once a judge has obtained a level of competence, that competence is maintained without the corresponding diligence. In this issue, judges are made aware that distracted driving, once associated with an active disturbance or incident, is now commonplace due to the day-to-day bad habits of everyday drivers. The Feldman piece brings to light the seriousness and frequency of these everyday thoughtless behaviors that can have catastrophic consequences. For a judge hearing these matters, the seriousness of the temporary loss of control of a vehicle should remain at the forefront. While a traffic matter with injuries is obviously a serious matter, the role of the judge in educating and informing violators who are fortunate enough to have not caused harm should not be overlooked.