- Letter to USPTO on the proposed patent fee schedule
-May 25, 2023
- Comments to the FTC on non-compete clause rulemaking
-April 19, 2023
- Letter on Expanding Admission Criteria
-February 1, 2023
- Letter on Expanding Opportunities to Appear Before the PTAB
- February 1, 2023
- Comment Letter Study on NFTs and Related IP law issues
- January 20, 2023
- Letter in Response to RFC RE Patent Robustness
- January 26, 2023
- Comments to FTC on Impersonation of Government and Business
- December 16, 2022
- Letter to Senators Leahy and Tillis on provisions of the “Pride in Patent Ownership Act,” S. 2774.
- November 28, 2022
- Letter to USPTO on TTAB Final Pretrial Conference Pilot Program
- October 28, 2022
- Letter to USPTO on changes to representation of others
- October 26, 2022
- Letter to Senator Tillis in support of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- September 15, 2022
- Letter to FTC re: Impersonation of Government and Businesses
- September 1, 2022
- Comments on implementation of the Trademark Modernization Act
- March 15, 2021
- Comments on draft Digital Copyrights Act of 2021
-March 5, 2021
- Letter to the USPTO on proposed continuing legal education requirements for patent practitioners
- January 6, 2021
- Comments to the Biden Presidential Transition Team on IP issues
- December 22, 2020
- Letter to the USPTO on its study of state sovereign immunity and its impact on trademark infringement
- December 21, 2020
- Letter to the USPTO on contributory vicarious trademark infringement liability
- December 21, 2020
- Letter to the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board regarding issuance of precedential decisions
- December 17, 2020
- Comments on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to Sen. Thom Tillis
- December 1, 2020
- Letter to the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board on discretion to institute trials before the PTAB
- November 18, 2020
- Comments to USPTO on changes to regulations on representations of others
- September 28, 2020
- Comments to the House Judiciary Committee on the SHOP SAFE Act of 2020
- August 25, 2020
- Comments to People’s Republic of China on Draft Amendments to the Patent Law
- August 13, 2020
- Letter to the USPTO on proposed trademark fee adjustments
- July 29, 2020
- Letter to the USPTO on SPC’s Six Draft Judicial Interpretations and Guidance
- July 17, 2020
- Letter to USPTO on PTAB Rules of Practice
- June 26, 2020
- Letter to EC on artificial intelligence white paper
- May 15, 2020
- Comments to USPTO re: China draft guidelines on enforcement of IP judgments
- May 11, 2020
- Letter to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board concerning issuance of precedential decisions
- March 10, 2020
- Letter to the Librarian of Congress on Copyright Register qualifications
- March 10, 2020
- Comments to WIPO on IP Policy and Artificial Intelligence
- February 12, 2020
- Comments to the USPTO on intellectual property protection for artificial intelligence innovation
- January 9, 2020
- Comments to USPTO on PTAB motions to amend
- December 20, 2019
- U.S. Supreme Court issues opinion in Peter v. Nantkwest, Inc.
- December 11, 2019
- Comments to USPTO on Patent Term Adjustment Reductions
- December 3, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO on patent-related issues regarding AI inventions
- November 8, 2019
- Comments to the Customs and Border Protection agency on abandoned merchandise
- November 6, 2019
- Comments to the CA AG on WHOIS Database IP Rights
- December 6, 2019
- Comments to USPTO TTAB regarding issuance of precedential decisions
- October 24, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO regarding proposed trademark fee increases
- October 8, 2019
- Letter to the American Law Institute (“ALI”) on its ongoing project to develop a Restatement of the Law, Copyright
- October 8, 2019
- Letter to Congress on Trademark Reform
- September 9, 2019
- Letter to House Judiciary Committee on the CASE Act
- September 6, 2019
- Letter to Congress recommending additions to the IDEA Act
- September 30, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO on Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees|
- September 30, 2019
- ABA House of Delegates adopts three ABA-IPL Section resolutions as ABA policy
- August 13, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO on the report required by the Success Act
- June 28, 2019
- Supplemental Comments to the USPTO on the report required by the Success Act
- June 28, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO TTAB on proposed changes to the Standard Protective Order
- June 25, 2019
- Supplemental responses to questions for the record on the State of Patent Eligibility in America
- June 24, 2019
- Letter to Senate IP Subcommittee providing supplemental views on the State of Patent Eligibility in America
- June 18, 2019
- Letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee and U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2019
- May 7, 2019
- Comments to the Commissioner for Trademarks, USPTO, on a requirement of U.S. licensed attorneys for foreign trademark applicants and registrants
--March 20, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO on Examining Computer-Implemented Functional Claim Limitations for Compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112 Guidance
- March 7, 2019
- Comments to the USPTO on the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance
- March 7, 2019
- Comments to the U.S. Copyright Office on registration modernization
- January 10, 2019
- ABA-IPL Section Comments to the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator on the 2019 Joint Strategic Plan
- November 13, 2018
- Letter to the American Law Institute (“ALI”) on its ongoing project to develop a Restatement of the Law, Copyright
- October 3, 2018
- Comments to the USPTO on the Draft Strategic Plan 2018-2022
- September 20, 2018
- Section Chair Mark Dickson testifies at PPAC Public Hearing on the Proposed Patent Fee Schedule
- September 6, 2018
- Comments to the USPTO regarding the Proposed Patent Fee Schedule.
- September 5, 2018
- Comments to the FTC's Hearing on Competition and Consumer Protection in conjunction with ABA Section of Antitrust Law, with respect to Topic 8 of FTC’s Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century.
- August 20, 2018
- Letter to the USPTO on subject matter eligibility
on determining whether a claim element is well-understood, routine, conventional for purposes of subject matter eligibility (Berkheimer memorandum).
- August 20, 2018
- Letter to the USPTO regarding changes to the Trademark Rules of Practice to mandate electronic filing.
- August 20, 2018
- ABA-IPL Letters to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees supporting the extension of the USPTO’s User Fee Setting Authority.
- August 20, 2018