The Justice Defenders Program mobilizes the legal community to respond to the global crackdown on civil society and support at-risk lawyers. So far, the Program has supported threatened attorneys, prosecutors, and judges in over twelve different countries on every continent. The Program's support has resulted in the activists' releases from prison, dropped charges, improved conditions of confinement, increased protective measures, reinstatement to the bench, decreased restrictions on the independence of the bar, and increased investigations into violent attacks against lawyers.
SEE OUR WORK
Independence of Judges and Lawyers
See below for examples of the Program's public work to support lawyers, judges, and the legal process.
BELARUS
Preliminary Report on the Disbarment of Alexander Pylchenko
The Justice Defenders Program found that Mr. Pylchenko was disbarred in what appears to be a violation of national and international law standards, further undermining the rule of law in Belarus.
Belarus: Analysis of Arbitrary Disbarments of Liudmila Kazak, Konstantin Mikhel, Maxim Konon, and Mikhail Kirilyuk
The Justice Defenders Program found that the disbarments of these four lawyers violate the fundamental, long-standing principles that safeguard the independence of the legal profession.
CENTRAL AMERICA
Testimony Before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission on Judicial Independence in Central America
On Wednesday, June 9, 2021, Brittany Benowitz, Chief Counsel of ABA Center for Human Rights, spoke before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission of the United States Congress to discuss judicial independence in Central America. Through an inter-agency strategy & by providing support to local anti-corruption actors, the US can help address attacks on the judiciary in the region.
GUATEMALA
Guatemalan Constitutional Court: Foreclosing Judicial Review of Allegations of Corruption in Selection of Judges
This report reviews the Constitutional Court’s decision to reject challenges filed by Guatemalan attorney, Alfonso Carrillo, and finds that the dismissal of those challenges was not consistent with relevant national or international standards, raising concern that the claims were dismissed in an effort to shield the magistrates from inquiries into the legitimacy of their nominations.
Statement of ABA President Patricia Lee Refo Re: Appointment of magistrates in Guatemala
The American Bar Association is deeply concerned by media accounts and reports from human rights observers about widespread irregularities in the appointment of magistrates to the Constitutional Court of Guatemala.
Declaración de la presidenta de la ABA, Patricia Lee Refo, sobre el nombramiento de magistrados en Guatemala
La American Bar Association está profundamente preocupada por los informes en medios de comunicación y los informes de observadores de derechos humanos sobre las irregularidades generalizadas en el nombramiento de magistrados para la Corte Constitucional de Guatemala.
Letter from ABA President Patricia Lee Refo to Guatemalan Bar Association on Constitutional Court Selection
ABA President Patricia Lee Refo and the Center call for transparency in the upcoming Constitutional Court selection process in Guatemala and offer the ABA's support to the Guatemalan Bar Association to vet candidates in a transparent process to ensure candidates are selected on the basis of merits and honorability.
Letter from ABA President Patricia Lee Refo to Guatemalan Supreme Court on Constitutional Court Selection
ABA President Patricia Lee Refo and the Center call for transparency in the upcoming Constitutional Court selection process in Guatemala and offer the ABA's support to the Supreme Court of Guatemala to vet candidates in a transparent process to ensure candidates are selected on the basis of merits and honorability.
Preliminary Report: Guatemalan High Court Selection Proceedings
As the Guatemalan Congress selected new Supreme Court and Appellate Court judges, the Justice Defenders Program emphasized that the Congress must require the candidates to disclose to the public documents concerning their past legal work and hold open hearings examining the candidates’ records.
Guatemala: Preliminary Report on the Selection of High Court Magistrates and Judges
As the Guatemalan Congress reviewed nominations for new judges and magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice and appellate courts, the staff of the Center for Human Rights prepared this preliminary report on international standards and practices concerning the selection of judges in a manner that is objective, transparent, and non-discriminatory. The report summarizes international standards and comparative practices in different countries, including in particular the judicial selection process in the United States. The ABA has participated in the selection of federal judges in the United States for nearly 60 years and monitored judicial selection proceedings around the world. Based on this experience, Center staff respectfully offer a number of recommendations relevant to the pending proceedings in Guatemala.
POLAND
Disciplinary Hearing Observation Report: Polish Judge Alina Czubieniak
The Justice Defenders Program monitored the disciplinary proceedings of Judge Alina Czubieniak, an embematic case in a crackdown on the independence of the judiciary in Poland. The Program highlighted growing evidence that, in addition to the threat to judicial independence posed by the Disciplinary Chamber's creation and process, the Ministry of Justice has used the new process to target judges whose rulings are inconvenient and to chill legitimate and protected free speech.
Poland: Erosion of Judicial Independence Continues
In conjunction with other ABA entities, the Justice Defenders Program denounced the Polish government’s sweeping reforms to crack down on the independence of the judiciary.
Interview with the Dean of the Warsaw Bar Association
The Justice Defenders Program interviewed Mikolaj Pietzrak, Dean of the Warsaw Bar Association, to discuss the erosion of judicial independence in Poland and what we can do to help.
Threats to judicial independence – not discussion of the Holocaust – are the real threat to Polish democracy
Brittany Benowitz, director of the Justice Defenders Program, warns the Polish government’s campaign against judicial independence in Poland could culminate in a more pliable justice system, largely unable to fulfill its critical role of upholding Poland’s Constitution and the rights of its citizens, and thereby eroding the rule of law.
The Case of Igor Tuleya: Continued Threats to Judicial Independence in Poland
On November 18, 2020, the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court of Poland ruled to lift Judge Igor Tuleya’s immunity so that the prosecutor’s office may pursue criminal charges against him for his decision to permit media attendance at a December 2017 hearing in his courtroom. The November 18 ruling was the culmination of an ongoing campaign by the National Prosecutor’s Office against Judge Tuleya in recent years due to his public criticism of the PiS government’s judicial reforms. This report outlines the various disciplinary inquiries that the prosecutor’s office has instituted against Judge Tuleya since 2018, as well as the proceedings before the Disciplinary Chamber concerning his judicial immunity.
TANZANIA
Statement of Concern on Permanent Disbarment of Tanzanian Lawyer, Fatma Karume
The ABA is deeply concerned with the decision of the Advocates Disciplinary Committee in Tanzania to permanently disbar Ms. Fatma Karume from practicing law in Tanzania. The ABA is concerned that the excessive punishment imposed on Ms. Karume, a lawyer who is a vocal critic of the government and involved in a case challenging an action of the government, threatens the rule of law.
Universal Periodic Review Submission by ABA Center for Human Rights (39th Session)
In this submission to the third periodic cycle of the Universal Periodic Review of the United Republic of Tanzania, ABA CHR provides updates and makes recommendations regarding the human rights situation in Tanzania including on the topics of the use of restrictive laws to suprress rights to freedom of expression and association; the misuse of non-bailable laws; the violation of rights of arrested persons and enforced disappearances; laws limiting access to justice; and threats to independence of the legal profession.