chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.
August 30, 2024

Jarkesy Will Have a Far Greater Impact on Healthcare Law Than Loper Bright

On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Loper Bright overturning the 40-year-old Chevron ruling. However, the previous day’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, which held that the Seventh Amendment required a jury trial for the Securities and Exchange Commission to impose civil penalties for securities fraud, is likely to have an even greater impact on healthcare law than the Chevron reversal. The Court has not deferred to an agency's interpretation under Chevron since 2016, making the Loper Bright decision somewhat anticipated. In contrast, Jarkesy, when applied to the healthcare context, may significantly shift how the government must handle civil penalties against healthcare providers accused of fraud. 

Previously, HHS’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) often assessed civil monetary penalties (CMPs) through HHS administrative law judge (ALJ) proceedings. Following Jarkesy, however, a jury trial may be required for HHS OIG to assess CMPs. Moreover, because the Jarkesy decision was based on the constitutional right to a jury trial, the decision could also influence how states manage CMPs. 

Additionally, it is unclear how Jarkesy may affect the federal Self-Disclosure Protocol.  For example, whether self-disclosure by a provider waives its jury trial rights and allows the ALJ to impose penalties could have lasting implications for future disclosures of fraudulent actions.

Entity:
Topic:
The material in all ABA publications is copyrighted and may be reprinted by permission only. Request reprint permission here.