Politico adds,
- “It’s crunch time for Democrats and Republicans to come to a deal on a health care package to attach to government funding.
- “The soft deadline for releasing bill text for a stopgap funding patch is usually the Sunday before the deadline. That means it would have to be out by Dec. 15 ahead of the Dec. 20 deadline. House Speaker Mike Johnson has targeted this week to release the legislation, leaving little time for lawmakers to agree on a health care package.
- “Several other issues must still be resolved, including disaster-aid spending, which could complicate efforts on health care provisions.
- “The state of play: Republicans and Democrats exchanged offers last week on a health care package. They aren’t far apart on some issues that might be easier to resolve — extending telehealth and hospital-at-home care rules and averting doctor pay cuts — but have significant differences to reconcile, including how to pay for it.
- “Democrats propose regulations for pharmacy benefit managers — companies that negotiate drug prices for insurers or employers — that go beyond Republicans’ offer. Republicans propose repealing a Biden-era rule to increase nursing home staffing, a move they had already planned for next year. Democrats are also pushing to extend enhanced Affordable Care Act plan subsidies, but it’s not necessarily a line in the sand.
- “Other issues being discussed include a potential compromise on legislation aimed at cracking down on Chinese biotechs. That didn’t hitch a ride on a negotiated version of a must-pass defense policy bill, the National Defense Authorization Act, released Saturday.
- “If both sides agree to negotiate in good faith, a deal shouldn’t be that far away — in theory, at least. Republicans could have incentive to walk away when they will gain full control of Washington in weeks, while Democrats could force Republicans to come to a deal with a slim House majority next Congress.”
Fierce Healthcare explains “How Trump could roll back Biden-era healthcare regulations.”
BioSpace relates,
- “An appeals court on Wednesday ruled against Novartis in its bid to block the entry of MSN Pharmaceuticals’ generic competitor to the blockbuster heart failure drug Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan), according to Reuters and other outlets.
- “First approved in 2015, Entresto is an oral drug indicated for the treatment of heart failure in adults. It combines the neprilysin blocker sacubitril with the angiotensin receptor inhibitor valsartan to lower blood pressure and vascular resistance. Since hitting the market, Entresto has become Novartis’ top-selling asset, raking in more than $6 billion in net sales globally last year.
- “In its decision on Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with a lower court’s verdict that Novartis had not sufficiently proven that it could win a patent suit against MSN. The appellate judges saw “no clear error in the district court’s analysis,” as reported by Reuters.”
Modern Healthcare reports,
- “Hospitals have expanded their legal push for the federal government to boost Medicare reimbursement.
- “More than 500 hospitals last week sued the Health and Human Services Department for allegedly miscalculating a 40-year-old Inpatient Prospective Payment System base reimbursement rate that providers say has lowered years of subsequent Medicare payments to hospitals. The lawsuit is the latest in a series of similar complaints that allege the Health and Human Services Department must increase Medicare inpatient pay.
- “Each lawsuit challenges different batches of denied requests to amend reimbursement rates, but the arguments are largely the same. Hundreds of millions of dollars are at stake, providers allege. If the federal government changes the inpatient base pay rate, hospitals stand to not only recoup money from prior fiscal years but also increase future reimbursement rates.”
The American Hospital Association News tells us,
- “A $2.8 billion settlement from Blue Cross Blue Shield to health care providers resolving a 12-year antitrust lawsuit received preliminary approval yesterday from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The settlement will also “significantly improve how Providers will interact with the Blues, bringing more transparency and efficiency to their dealings, and increase Blue Plan accountability,” according to the court filing.
- “The lawsuit alleged that BCBS member companies violated antitrust laws by agreeing to allocate markets via exclusive service areas and fixing prices paid to health care providers through the organization’s BlueCard Program.”
