Law schools routinely tell students to “think like a lawyer.” In the practice of law, however, it is critically important for attorneys not only to think as lawyers, but also to communicate their clients’ positions in the manner most likely to achieve the best result. Lawyers must advocate their clients’ positions effectively, efficiently, and when appropriate—emphatically. This article discusses how to communicate with the Court in a manner that will be well-received and, most importantly, persuasive. Before contacting the Court, ask yourself the following questions:
What Are You Asking?
As an initial matter, you will need to discern in an emotionally intelligent, self-aware, and professional fashion what it is that you are asking of the Court. Imagine you are the judge receiving a five-page, single-spaced correspondence. Midway through the second full page of text, you still do not understand the nature of the request. It is not only frustrating to the Court but also a disservice to your client. Avoid being the author of such correspondence by crystalizing the actual request in your mind—then ask. A simple and routine adjournment or extension request should not take the tone and length of a Shakespearean tragedy. Time is a valuable commodity. Do not waste your time, and never waste the Court’s time. Once you have identified your precise request, avoid two common but dangerous pitfalls by following the advice below.
Avoid emotional pleas. In the course of litigation, you will necessarily have differences of opinion with your adversary. Occasionally, you will have to involve the Court to bridge this gap. Do not let your emotions become a distraction. Always remember that the Court’s decision will never turn upon who sends the angrier letter. After a heated conversation with your adversary, resist the urge to send a scathing letter about a potentially inconsequential issue. Emotional, “venting,” and name-calling correspondence will often do more to damage your rapport with the judge than to advance your client’s position.
Do not ask for more than you need. If you require a one-week adjournment of a hearing or need an additional week to file a pleading and have a reasonable justification, do not request a one-month extension or adjournment. Alternatively, perhaps a recent appellate ruling may be interpreted to be unfavorable to your client’s position. The facts of your case, however, are readily distinguishable from that appellate decision. Your adversary insists that you are taking an extremist position and seeking to overrule established precedent. Do not take the bait. Rather, take the narrow position that the appellate decision does not apply to the current facts. There is no benefit in taking a broad stance on an issue that may ultimately be denied, when a narrower (more defensible) position that gets the result you are seeking for your client is available.
Once you have clarified what it is you’re asking, you must assess. . . .
Is It Worth Asking?
Gone are the days of the old adage “There is no such thing as a silly question.” It is incumbent on you as a professional to be aware that judges have extremely busy dockets that require significant concentrated attention. As a result, you should consider whether your question is truly appropriate. In the modern world of technology, it has become increasingly simple and perhaps even tempting to fire off correspondence to the Court or place a call to chambers without fully thinking through whether the request is necessary.
For example, you are appearing before a judge for the first time and you want to impress the judge with your skill and professionalism. You have conducted copious research and have become an expert in the relevant area of law while skillfully crafting your brief. Alas, your brief is complete and you are anxious for the judge to read it and be amazed. You realize, however, that you are unsure whether the Court wants a courtesy copy of your stellar brief. You contact chambers, and an unenthusiastic and perhaps moderately annoyed law clerk responds, “Have you consulted the local rules and the judge’s preferences?” The lesson here is never to ask anything of the Court (or the Court staff) that is readily available by examining a rule or the judge’s preferences. In addition to wasting the Court’s time, asking for information that you should already know may make an attorney look unprepared or, even worse, lazy. An action that impugns your credibility, even if unintentionally, is always a mistake.
Similarly, prior to raising requests with the Court, first discuss any potential issues with your adversary. If you are seeking leave for supplemental briefing or to file a brief of greater length than permitted by the rules, speak with your adversary and request consent. The Court may be more inclined to grant a request when it is submitted with consent of the parties. To put a request before the Court without first gauging your adversary’s position may be premature. Moreover, the rules in certain jurisdictions prohibit filing discovery motions without first communicating with your adversary.
Now that you have identified your question and that the relief you are seeking is worth requesting, the next inquiry is. . . .