Choice of Entity
Oh, yes, back to the choice of entity. The selection of a law firm entity often occurs during the start-up phase of the practice and, alas, is often merely driven by a “ready-fire-aim” mentality focusing more on clients, office logistics, and other just-getting-started issues. However, one of the most significant early decisions a lawyer must make is which type of entity will best suit his/her current and, as best as possible, future needs.
The wrong legal structure can cost more in taxes, increase liability exposure, increase administrative costs and headaches, unnecessarily decrease flexibility, and expose the attorney(s) to costly business hassles. Still, it’s a dynamic process, and while the selection of a particular type of entity may have been appropriate yesterday, today’s factors might alter that logic as federal, state, and local laws—as well as practice dynamics—are continually changing.
Tax issues aside for the moment, limiting one’s personal liability is typically a key reason why attorneys should shy away from a sole proprietorship or general partnership. Sole proprietors and general partnerships just don’t have the limited liability protection afforded by the other, now-proven types of entities. No entity form will shield a lawyer from her or his own professional negligence or that of the attorneys and subordinates she or he directly supervises. However, an LLC, PC, and LLP will provide some protection from vicarious liability for the professional negligence of other lawyers in the practice and often the general business liabilities of the firm. You’ll want to check your own state for specifics on such “full shield” protection. Regardless, a bad decision, an inadvertent mishap, or inadequate insurance coverage where you thought you had ample, can cause the loss of savings, a home, cars, or other personal assets, let alone assets of the firm. Even when you think your risk of being sued is minimal or you believe your insurance is sufficient, your exposure increases markedly by adding vendors or employees to the mix, having clients and others actually visit your offices, or having an increased website presence with information and pictures you believe to be innocuous but that someone else may view differently.
No, I didn’t forget consideration of taxes when deciding which entity type to use, but, honestly, that’s a comprehensive, fact-sensitive discussion in and of itself. For example, what I might have suggested for even one particular law firm as recently as autumn 2017 might elicit a different conversation for that same practice as we sit here in 2018 (thank you, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017). The most important takeaway from this discussion is to use a seasoned business attorney (that might be you) and an accountant to properly set up your law firm. The choice of business form has too many significant and far-reaching financial, tax, and liability implications for you to approach the decision without informed advice. You must set up the practice the right way and prospectively monitor that it continues to be appropriate.
Succession Planning
For many attorneys, increased personal spending, spiraling costs of raising and educating a family, minimal outside interests, less-than-stellar investment returns, and even boredom translates into a later retirement than they ever planned. Is 75 the new 65? It’s hard to imagine when you just start a practice, but an often-overlooked asset you may maximize as a salable asset is your law firm itself (even beyond the income it provides while you practice). If you recognize operational and practice development opportunities early enough, there are firm efficiencies, client development, and practice management tips you can utilize now to help maximize your firm’s value later. Alas, the level of urgency will often limit one to take the less-than-opportune path. This is all the more reason to identify and shore up the value factors where you can—ahead of time.
At inception and then prospectively, the attorney practitioner is well advised to keep the following readily available for the current and preceding years (I generally like to see five), to share with his or her team/advisors:
- firm head count and census data;
- financial statements;
- income tax returns;
- attorney compensation data;
- documents reflecting long-term commitments, such as pension obligations; loans payable; leases; employment agreements; firm/employee handbook regarding overtime, vacation, and sick pay, 401(k) plan, etc.; health insurance plan; IT operations manual; partner buyout obligations; and other commitments;
- malpractice insurance policies and applications;
- available management reports such as accounts receivable and agings; unbilled work in progress; contingency fee case inventory; pipeline report; attorney/paralegal productivity and time reporting; cash receipt fee allocation; area of practice productivity; cash requirements; payables and other liabilities;
- details of any lawsuits where the lawyer has been the plaintiff or defendant;
- if time records are not maintained, details to explain why and how the time of partners and staff is controlled;
- documents explaining partner/associate compensation system, bonuses, production, etc.;
- documents related to succession plans of the firm;
- partnership agreement, buy-sell agreement, etc.;
- strategic or business plans; and
- marketing plan.
The better you have your information organized, the better prepared you’ll be to effectively manage your firm. Always look at it critically and try to imagine what a prospective partner, suitor, consultant, or appraiser would say, and how you would react if this were someone else’s information being presented to you.
Start with the End in Mind
The conclusion to this article was implied at the beginning, so let me state it explicitly now: Start your practice by focusing not only on your immediate needs but also with the end in mind—even though you don’t know when that end will actually be.