You may catch me doing it at any time of the day, but my favorite time of all is right before lunch. I slip into a spot in one of the back rows of the courtroom and try to be as quiet as I can be, but once in a while, I cannot help myself and let out a bit of a groan or a laugh. That is what happened a few weeks ago. The noise got a second chair’s attention; he came back and asked if I were the appraiser they expected to testify later that day. “No,” I said, and with quiet apologies to Chauncey Gardiner in the film Being There, I added, “I like to watch.”
I have been watching lawyers for more than 35 years. The practice has brought me episodes of confusion, frustration, and wonder, but more so than any seminar, webinar, or program, it has been the most productive element of my continuing legal education since passing the bar. The fact is, for me at least, every lawyer I have seen at work, whether my supervisor, subordinate, co-counsel, or adversary, has contributed in some way to my mosaic of legal experience.
When I started as a new lawyer in a large firm, constructing my mosaic was easy. I was surrounded by highly experienced and talented litigators. Each seems to have his or her own style. Some were very scholarly, while others strove for a common touch. A few were distinguished in exploiting the rules of practice on the unsuspecting, while others gave the same rules only minimal regard and kept a strategic focus. Some chose to write in direct and sparse language; others chose a more elaborate briefing style. I was so fortunate to see such a variety of ways to practice law and not be compelled to take one approach over the others. This was when I began selecting the large tiles of my mosaic: how to compose a memorandum, make an oral argument, conduct a deposition, and prepare for a trial. It was also when I learned that being a good lawyer means that there is rarely, if ever, only one way to approach a case or protect a client’s interest.