Privacy and Platform Considerations
When selecting a GenAI platform, privacy should be a paramount concern for all practitioners. Free versions of popular platforms such as ChatGPT are readily available, but their terms of service often allow for the collection and retention of input data. For legal work involving sensitive client information, paid versions may offer enhanced privacy protections and data handling guarantees. Consider this distinction carefully when choosing your platform.
Some attorneys—myself included—have begun incorporating language about AI tool usage into their engagement agreements, transparently communicating their intention to leverage these technologies while maintaining professional responsibility. This proactive approach helps set client expectations while demonstrating technological competence.
Practical Applications
Generative AI can prove valuable for assisting with both routine and complex litigation tasks. As an example from my own practice, I regularly use these tools to generate working drafts of deposition outlines, factual timelines, and sample discovery requests. The software can analyze case documents and help create comprehensive question sets that often reveal angles I might not have immediately considered. Consider this simple but effective prompt:
We represent the plaintiff in the attached lawsuit. We will be deposing [Name], the driver of the vehicle that collided with plaintiff. We believe the driver was texting at the time of the accident. You are an experienced personal injury attorney. The driver initially admitted to causing the accident but later changed their story. Prepare a deposition outline in a question-and-answer format that I can use when taking the driver’s deposition.
The resulting outline produced by a GenAI system typically provides a good starting foundation that can be refined based on specific case details and strategy.
On the transactional side, GenAI shines in document review and drafting tasks. When faced with lengthy contracts or complex documentation, these tools can quickly summarize key provisions, flag potential issues, and even suggest alternative language for problematic clauses.
For routine document drafting, something as simple as, “Please revise the following paragraph for clarity: [insert text]” can yield significant improvements in readability and precision. The key is to remember that these outputs should serve as first drafts, always subject to thorough review.
Best Practices for Implementation
Success with GenAI tools requires a thoughtful approach to implementation. Practitioners should keep the following best practices in mind when using any of the platforms:
- Always verify factual assertions in AI-generated content against your case materials.
- Maintain a clear review process for all AI-generated drafts.
- Stay current with platform updates and privacy policies.
- Use specific, well-crafted prompts to obtain the best results.
- Keep detailed records of what content was produced with GenAI tools.
GenAI Should Enhance, Not Replace, Your Professional Judgment
As GenAI tools continue to evolve, they will likely become as fundamental to legal practice as word processors and electronic research platforms. By embracing GenAI as a digital associate, solo practitioners can enhance their efficiency, reduce routine workload, and focus more energy on the highest-value aspects of their practice. After all, sailing solo requires constant adaptability and resourcefulness.
Remember, GenAI should enhance, not replace, your professional judgment. When used thoughtfully, these tools can help you focus more time on the aspects of practice that truly require human insight and creativity—complex problem-solving, client relationships, and strategic decision-making. The key lies in understanding the capabilities and limitations of these tools, implementing them thoughtfully, and maintaining an unwavering commitment to professional responsibility and client service.