Artificial intelligence (AI) has stepped to the front of the line regarding hot technology topics. AI issues cover the waterfront from exceptionally good to horrific. AI references the science of making machines that can think like humans. AI can recognize patterns, make decisions, and judge like humans, but it can assemble and assimilate huge amounts of data much more rapidly. As AI has evolved, people have found more things for it to do, many of which can help us personally and professionally.
As AI grows continuously more user-friendly and evolves into an increasingly powerful technology, we will find it encroaching on our personal and professional lives more and more. We will undoubtedly welcome some of that involvement and wish to eschew other portions of it. This article will not address whether you should use AI in your practice. It starts from the premise that you will. In fact, most practicing attorneys already use AI in their professional and personal lives, whether they know it or not.
We have used AI in our practices for some time. The online research tools we use represent a basic form of AI. Digital assistants such as Siri, Alexa, and Hey Google offer additional examples of our use of AI, as do connected “smart” homes and offices. Other examples of AI used by or for us in our daily lives include, without limitation, fraud detection by financial institutions, image and facial recognition, autonomous vehicle operation, chatbots for customer service, and medical diagnoses. Now that the newest iteration of ChatGPT has managed to pass a bar exam without ever attending a day of law school, anticipate even greater pressure from vendors to implement it in your practice and to give it increasing responsibility. Despite my affinity for technology, I continue to have concerns about the uses to which we put ChatGPT.
We have reached the point where the relevant question no longer relates to whether we should use AI in our personal lives and/or our practice. Rather, the question we now must ask addresses the uses to which we put AI in those contexts.
Given that we will deal with AI, likely extensively, moving forward, the most significant questions we will face include: How do we deal with AI effectively? How do we deal with AI efficiently? And how do we deal with AI safely? I long ago abandoned the idea that passing the bar established the qualifications to practice law or that everyone who passes the bar should practice law.
We cannot overlook or over-emphasize the significance of the risk associated with using AI, as AI currently comes without a moral compass. It does the work assigned to it by humans without concern as to right or wrong. AI has had a history of using false information to support conclusions, making up citations of authority, and other similar behaviors that can give attorneys nightmares or even lead to disciplinary actions and disbarment. While, ultimately, we will be able to train AI to recognize the difference between real and false citations, AI has not yet reached that point.