chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.

GPSolo eReport

GPSolo eReport March 2025

How Artificial Intelligence Is Affecting Intellectual Property Law

Keshia Joachim

Summary

  • AI systems are now capable of generating inventions autonomously, raising the question of who the inventor is.
  • Current U.S. copyright law does not recognize AI as an author; as a result, AI-generated content cannot currently be copyright protected.
  • Trademark law is one field where AI can aid in the traditional concerns of the practice area.
  • AI’s analytical capabilities can potentially be used to reverse-engineer products and uncover trade secrets.
How Artificial Intelligence Is Affecting Intellectual Property Law
FreezeFrameStudio via Getty Images

Jump to:

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have had a profound impact on intellectual property (IP) law, which encompasses patents, copyright, trademarks, and trade secrets. This article explores this impact and highlights areas of particular importance for IP practitioners.

AI and Patent Law

Traditionally, patents are granted to people who create novel inventions. However, AI systems are now capable of generating inventions autonomously, raising the question of who the inventor is . Current legal frameworks typically require a natural person to be named as the inventor, but what happens when an AI system is the primary contributor to an invention? Some jurisdictions are considering whether AI can be recognized as an inventor in such situations, while other jurisdictions, including the United States, have firmly stated that inventorship must be attributed to a human.

Copyright law

Similarly, copyright protection is traditionally granted only to human authors of original works, including writing, music, or artwork. But if the work is created by AI, who is the author? Is it the person who input the information into the AI system or the AI software itself? Current U.S. copyright law does not recognize AI as an author; as a result, AI-generated content cannot currently be copyright protected.

Additionally, for a work to be copyrighted, it must be original. AI’s ability to mimic human creativity challenges the definition of what is considered original. If an AI-generated work closely resembles existing works, does it meet the threshold for originality, or is it merely derivative?

Trademark Law

Trademark law is one field where AI can aid in the traditional concerns of the practice area. AI-powered tools can streamline the process of searching for existing trademarks, which makes it easier to see what is available and thus avoid potential trademark conflicts. AI tools can also help monitor the marketplace for trademark infringement by scanning online platforms and identifying unauthorized use of protected marks. This helps to enforce the rights of trademark owners.

But, as with patent and copyright law, the generative capabilities of AI raise the question of ownership and protection. If AI generates a logo, slogan, or even a brand name, who is the proper owner?

Trade Secrets

AI systems often rely on vast amounts of data, which may include trade secrets (confidential business information that provides a competitive edge). Ensuring the security of this data is crucial, as any breach could compromise proprietary information. Further, AI’s analytical capabilities can potentially be used to reverse-engineer products and uncover trade secrets. This raises concerns about how to protect sensitive information from sophisticated AI-driven analysis.

Bias

The use of AI brings not only legal challenges but also ethical concerns. AI systems can be altered to produce biased decisions, raising questions about fairness and equity in IP rights and enforcement. For example, if an AI system disproportionately favors certain demographics in its analysis, this could have legal implications. The nature of some AI systems makes it difficult to understand how decisions are rendered. In the context of IP, this lack of transparency can complicate disputes over authorship, inventorship, and infringement.

The Need for Legislative Responses

There is a growing need for legislative bodies to update IP laws to reflect the realities of AI-generated works and inventions. This could involve redefining authorship and inventorship, as well as establishing new criteria for originality.

As AI’s impact on IP is a global issue, international cooperation and harmonization of laws are essential. Legal professionals, technologists, and policymakers must collaborate to develop balanced solutions.

An Ongoing Dialogue

AI presents opportunities for innovation and efficiency, but it also poses significant challenges that require thoughtful legal and ethical responses. As attorneys, staying abreast of these developments and contributing to the ongoing dialogue is essential. By doing so, we can help shape a legal framework that supports both the protection of intellectual property rights and the advancement of AI technology.

    Author