Ask Techie: Should I Use Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 as Hearing Aids?

Q: Should I Use Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 as Hearing Aids?

A: Apple’s AirPods Pro 2, particularly with the advancements in adaptive transparency and live listen features, offer an attractive option for individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss. While Apple does not market them as medical-grade hearing aids, their technology provides benefits that overlap with traditional assistive listening devices.

Pros of Using Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 as Hearing Aids

1. Accessibility and affordability. One of the most significant advantages of using Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 as a hearing aid is accessibility. Traditional hearing aids can be prohibitively expensive, costing hundreds to thousands of dollars. AirPods Pro 2, priced at $249, are relatively affordable. This makes them an attractive option for individuals who need hearing assistance but cannot afford conventional hearing aids.
2. Advanced technology. Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 employ cutting-edge technology that can benefit users with mild to moderate hearing loss. Active noise cancellation (ANC) and transparency mode allow users to filter out unwanted background noise and amplify important sounds. The earbuds also have adaptive EQ and spatial audio, enhancing the listening experience.
3. Discreet design. The sleek and trendy design of AirPods Pro 2 blends seamlessly with contemporary fashion. This can help reduce the stigma associated with wearing hearing aids.
4. Multifunctionality. AirPods Pro 2 are not limited to hearing aid functionality; they can also be used for music, phone calls, and interacting with digital assistants such as Siri. Many hearing aids now offer similar functionality. The difference: AirPods Pro 2 do better with music, while the hearing aids do better as hearing aids.
5. Easy integration with the Apple ecosystem. AirPods Pro 2 offers seamless integration with other Apple devices for users already invested in the Apple ecosystem.

Cons of Using Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 as Hearing Aids

1. Limited audiological support. Traditional hearing aids are custom-fitted and programmed by audiologists to meet the user’s specific needs. AirPods Pro 2 lack this customization level and cannot address complex hearing issues. Recent changes in the law have allowed the sale of OTC (over-the-counter) hearing aids without the need for a prescription or an audiologist. Most OTC hearing aids cost less and do not perform as well as the prescription variety. Comparing Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 to the OTC universe makes better sense and provides a fairer comparison.
2. Battery life and charging. Another limitation of AirPods Pro 2 is their battery life. They offer around 6 hours of listening time on a single charge, which may not be sufficient for users who need all-day hearing assistance.
3. Potential for discomfort. Comfort is crucial for hearing aid users, as they often wear the devices for extended periods. While AirPods Pro 2 are designed to be comfortable, they may not fit all ear shapes and sizes perfectly. Some users may experience discomfort or even ear fatigue after prolonged use.
4. Lack of medical recognition. AirPods Pro 2 are not recognized as medical devices by regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This lack of medical recognition means they do not undergo the rigorous testing and approval process that traditional hearing aids do. Users may face risks not present with certified medical devices.
5. Dependence on Apple devices. Another drawback is the dependence on Apple devices for optimal functionality. Although you can use AirPods Pro 2 with non-Apple devices, you may find some features limited or unavailable.
6. Limited acceptance. While wearing AirPods Pro 2 works in most situations, it is unacceptable in others. For example, even if a judge allows you to wear them in their courtroom, would you want to wear them in front of a jury? I would not.

Listen Up

Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 offer several advantages as a supplementary hearing aid option. Their accessibility, advanced technology, discreet design, multifunctionality, and integration with the Apple ecosystem make them attractive to individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss.

While AirPods Pro 2 can provide a valuable solution for some users, I would not consider them as a replacement for professionally fitted hearing aids or even a good pair of OTC hearing aids. Individuals with significant hearing loss or complex audiological needs should seek the advice of a qualified audiologist to determine the most appropriate course of action, as neither the AirPods Pro 2 nor most OTC offerings will satisfactorily address their needs.

I would not purchase the AirPods Pro 2 if you only intend to use them as hearing aids. They do a great job with music, and I would buy them for that reason. That they have the technology to help with hearing provides frosting on the cake. I would not hesitate to use the hearing assistance features of the AirPods Pro 2. If you have mild to moderate hearing loss, they may help you in many situations. As technology continues to evolve, expect the gap between consumer electronics and medical devices to narrow, offering new and innovative solutions for hearing assistance.

Techie: Jeffrey Allen ([email protected]) is the principal in the Graves & Allen law firm, Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of GPSolo magazine and GPSolo eReport, and an editor and technology columnist for Experience magazine and the Voice of Experience.

Q: What Are the Best Technology Tools for Tracking Billable Hours and Invoicing?

A: Time tracking and invoicing software are essential for lawyers who bill by the hour or use flat-fee structures. The best tools do more than track time. They create invoices automatically, reducing the administrative burden and freeing lawyers to focus on client work. Many platforms also integrate with accounting systems such as QuickBooks and Xero, ensuring seamless financial management. Here are some tools you might consider:

• Clio. A legal practice management solution with built-in time tracking and billing, Clio syncs with QuickBooks and Xero, reducing manual data entry.
• TimeSolv. Designed for law firms, TimeSolv tracks billable hours and automates invoices. It supports LEDES billing, a must for firms working with corporate clients.
• Bill4Time. Offering time tracking, invoicing, and expense management, Bill4Time includes ABA-compliant billing and integrates with multiple payment processors.
• Toggl Track. A simple tool with powerful time-tracking features, Toggl Track integrates with many practice management solutions, although it is not law-specific.
• Harvest. Ideal for firms seeking a straightforward time and expense tracker, Harvest generates invoices based on logged hours and supports online payments.
• Rocket Matter. A cloud-based legal management system with robust billing and time tracking, Rocket Matter automates workflows, helping lawyers focus on clients.
• PracticePanther. An all-in-one solution, PracticePanther tracks time, creates invoices, and syncs with accounting software. Its mobile app allows tracking on the go.

Choose a tool that fits your workflow. Automating time tracking and billing reduces errors, ensures compliance, and speeds up collections.

Techie: Ashley Hallene, JD, is GPSolo eReport Editor-in-Chief ([email protected]).