Does Sackett bring clarity to “waters of the United States”?
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency has narrowed the scope of not only “adjacent wetlands” but also of “waters of the United States.”
Volume 54, Issue 6
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency has narrowed the scope of not only “adjacent wetlands” but also of “waters of the United States.”
Despite some nominally good outcomes, world leaders at the UN Biodiversity Conference failed to adopt a transformative biodiversity conservation roadmap to 2030.
With biodiversity loss expected to cost the global economy $2.7 trillion annually by 2030, governments and investors are pushing for greater disclosures and ramping up shareholder engagement and acti…
Recent headlines have pitted traditional allies of renewable energy and species conservation against each other, but an improved framework for ocean management should alleviate this perceived conflic…
Ensuring a reliable supply of critical minerals for climate change mitigation will require global coordination.
As the Rights of Nature movement gains momentum in Colorado, here are some ideas on how Rights of Rivers can be incorporated into existing water law.
Recasting environmental harm as a violation of human rights shows promise as a new legal strategy for international cases seeking environmental protection and responsibility for contributions to clim…
Understanding the difference between intentionally and unintentionally added PFAS into products has become a critical topic for the legal community.
Environmental Bankruptcy Law, a newly released SEER publication, is a practical guide intended to help experienced as well as newer attorneys navigate the complexities of environmental bankruptcy cas…
The Section chair reflects on the Section’s accomplishments and expresses his gratitude to leaders and members for their significant contributions this past year.
Keep up with your fellow Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources members’ recent moves and noteworthy accomplishments.