Property—both literally and figuratively—is the foundation for many of our legal constructs. Property can evoke a sense of place, security, wealth, and worth. It is something to trade, to do something with, or to put to use. Property can also be something that can be taken away or lost. It can describe something concrete and tangible—a place or thing—or something esoteric—a concept or theory. The articles in this issue run the gamut, addressing how property is impacted, defined, or used in relationship to the environment.
We start on the theoretical side with an article that challenges us to think about a constitutional “revolution” regarding relocating communities due to climate change. Ira Feldman and James R. May explore whether the U.S. Constitution is equipped to manage legal issues associated with managed retreat for climate adaptation, including people’s displacement from and loss of (livable) land, concluding that, while many provisions provide tools for the federal government to use, current constitutional jurisprudence ultimately may not be sufficient. Focusing on the Takings clause of the Constitution, Arthur Smith discusses the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado holding there is no general Takings clause exemption for state legislatively enacted impact fees to fund necessary road and access infrastructure associated with new development (including potential future infrastructure necessary to address climate resiliency), positing that the Sheetz decision hints at the Court’s heightened interest in landowner rights at the expense of local funding decisions.
The next set of articles have the common theme of how property law can help effectuate climate goals. Danielle DiMauro analyzes BLM initiatives focused on incentivizing wind and solar development on federal land. Jake Hirsch discusses key legal considerations to minimizing risk and developing solar energy projects on brownfield sites, including available financial incentives. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) implicates the legal question of “whose pore space is it?” and Vanessa A. Silke and Hannes D. Zetzsche provide an overview of the financial drivers, physical factors, and legal considerations for a CCS developer’s acquisition of pore space under privately owned land. Moving from below ground to above ground, Katherine Lee Goyette offers a view of the legal and technological issues associated with decarbonizing the aviation sector to promote climate goals.