Rethinking Neutrality: How Mediation Practices Unintentionally Uphold Racial Inequities
Challenging ADR neutrality, this article exposes how mediation practices can hide racial inequities and perpetuate structural power imbalances.
Volume 31, Issue 1
Challenging ADR neutrality, this article exposes how mediation practices can hide racial inequities and perpetuate structural power imbalances.
This article focuses on elevating mediation through reflective self-assessment, culturally sensitive training, and robust support for ethical, impartial conflict resolution.
By integrating anti-racist principles into mediation, we can create processes that are not only more inclusive but also more capable of addressing the root causes of conflict.
CLA’s Arts Arbitration & Mediation Services transforms arts dispute resolution with creative mediation and cross-cultural training.
Critiquing DEI in PWIs, this article advocates for anti-racist, equity-informed dispute resolution that confronts systemic bias in university settings.
This issue explores intercultural communication in dispute resolution, fostering inclusivity and equity among professionals. Insights from diverse perspectives.
Exploring intercultural dispute resolution, this issue highlights diverse perspectives, challenges neutrality, and emphasizes cultural competence in mediation.
Exploring ABA advisory ethics opinions on dispute resolution, this article reviews key rulings on negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and collaborative law.
Supreme Court and federal courts address key arbitration and jurisdiction disputes, including conflicting arbitration clauses, sovereign immunity, and FAA requirements.