chevron-down Created with Sketch Beta.

The Business Lawyer

Winter 2022-2023 | Volume 78, Issue 1

Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act—Proposed Amendments to Sections 2.07 and 3.03 Relating to Emergency Bylaws and Emergency Powers

Corporate Laws Committee

Summary

  • The Committee is proposing amendments to sections 6.04 and 6.25 to conform with the CTA’s provisions. 
  • In particular, because scrip can provide the holder with the rights of a shareholder, the Committee is proposing that section 6.04(b) of the Model Act be amended to prohibit the issuance of scrip in bearer form. 
  • The Committee is also proposing an amendment to section 6.25(a) to clarify that, consistent with section 6.25(b)(2), and as currently required by section 6.25, share certificates cannot be issued in bearer form.
  • The Committee is also proposing amendments to sections 6.04(a) and (b) to allow scrip to be issued in uncertificated form, subject to requirements similar to those for fractional and whole shares in uncertificated form.
Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act—Proposed Amendments to Sections 2.07 and 3.03 Relating to Emergency Bylaws and Emergency Powers
iStock.com/Janno Vaan

Jump to:

The Corporate Laws Committee of the ABA Business Law Section (the “Committee”) develops and proposes changes in the Model Business Corporation Act (the “Model Act”). The Committee has approved, on second reading, proposed amendments to sections 2.07 and 3.03, and the Official Comment to sections 2.07 and 3.03 of the Model Act (the “Amendments”), relating to emergency bylaws and emergency powers, and invites comments from interested persons. Comments should be addressed to Steven M. Haas, Chair, Corporate Laws Committee, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd Street, Richmond, VA 23219, or sent to him by e-mail at [email protected]. Comments should be received by March 31, 2023 in order to be considered by the Committee before adoption of the Amendments on third reading.

Background

In light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee reviewed sections 2.07 and 3.03 of the Model Act regarding emergency bylaws and emergency powers, respectively, and is proposing amendments to these sections to facilitate functioning of the board and holding shareholders’ meetings during the pendency of an emergency.

The proposed amendments to section 2.07 clarify that emergency bylaws may only be adopted in advance of an emergency, and will only be effective during an emergency. The proposed amendments do not modify the definition of “emergency” in section 2.07(d). That definition is based upon the inability of the board to readily assemble a quorum because of a catastrophic event. The proposed amendments to the Official Comment to section 2.07 explain that an “emergency” could result from a catastrophic event, whether of a widespread or company-specific nature, and provide a non-exclusive list of events that could result in an emergency.

The Official Comment to section 2.07 confirms that sections 2.07 and 3.03 do not limit powers that otherwise exist absent or during an emergency, and that emergency bylaws, like regular bylaws, are subject to amendment or repeal by the shareholders.

The definition of “emergency” in section 3.03 is bifurcated in the proposed amendments. The definition for purposes of emergency powers pertaining to functioning of the board of directors is the same as in section 2.07(d), while the definition for purposes of a meeting of the shareholders focuses upon a catastrophic event that makes it impracticable to convene a meeting.

Many companies faced challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic in convening in-person shareholders’ meetings. The proposed amendments to section 3.03 concerning shareholders’ meetings allow the board of directors, in the event of an emergency, to postpone a shareholders’ meeting for which notice has been given or authorize shareholders to participate in a meeting by any means of remote communication that conforms with the Model Act regarding remote participation. During such an emergency, the proposed amendments would allow the corporation to give notice to shareholders by such means and with such shorter advance notice as are reasonable in the circumstances.

Proposed Amendments

The Committee proposes changes to sections 2.07 and 3.03 of the Model Act and the corresponding sections of the Official Comment as set forth below. Changes to the existing provisions are marked with deletions shown by strikeouts and additions by double underscoring.

§ 2.07 Emergency Bylaws

  • (a) Unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise, the board of directors may adopt bylaws may contain provisions to be effective only induring an emergency defined in subsection (d). Such provisions may only be adopted in advance of an emergency. The emergency bylaws, which are subject to amendment or repeal by the shareholders, may make may contain all provisions necessary for managing the corporation during the emergency, including:
    • (1) procedures for calling a meeting of the board of directors;
    • (2) quorum requirements for the meeting; and
    • (3) designation of additional or substitute directors.
  • (b) All provisions of the regular bylaws not inconsistent with the emergency bylaws remain effective during the emergency. The emergency bylaws are not effective after the emergency ends.
  • (c) Corporate action taken in good faith in accordance with the emergency bylaws:
    • (1) binds the corporation; and
    • (2) may not be used to impose liability as a result of any such action on a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation.
  • (d) An emergency exists for purposes of this section if a quorum of the board of directors cannot readily be assembled because of some catastrophic event.

Cross-References

Amendment of bylaws, see §§ 10.20 and 10.21.

Bylaws, see § 2.06.

Emergency powers without bylaw provision, see § 3.03.

Official Comment

The adoption of emergency bylaws in advance of an emergency not only clarifies lines of command and responsibility that would apply during an emergency but also tends to ensure continuity of responsibility and functioning of the board of directors. The board of directors may be authorized by the emergency bylaws, for example, to designate the officers or other persons, in order of seniority and subject to various conditions, who may be deemed to be directors during the emergency.

The definition of An “emergency” adopted by as defined in section 2.07(d) includes any could result from a catastrophic event of a widespread or company-specific nature, such as a nuclear or atomic disaster, a cyberattack, an epidemic or pandemic, or an event that makes it difficult or impossible for a quorumgives rise to a declaration of a state of emergency by the board of directors to be assembledUnited States or by a state government. To encourage corporations to adopt emergency bylaws, section 2.07(c) broadly validates all corporate actions taken “in good faith” pursuant to them and immunizes all directors, officers, employees, and agents of the corporation from liability as a result of these actions. The phrase “action taken in good faith in accordance with the emergency bylaws” is designed to conform to the standard for immunity elsewhere in the Act.

A corporation that does not adopt emergency bylaws under this section may nevertheless exercise the powers described in section 3.03 in the event of an emergency as defined in section 2.07(d). Sections 2.07 and 3.03 do not limit powers that otherwise exist absent or during an emergency. Emergency bylaws, like regular bylaws, are subject to amendment or repeal by the shareholders.

§ 3.03 Emergency Powers

  • (a) In anticipation of or during an emergency defined in subsection (d), the board of directors of a corporation may:
    • (1) modify lines of succession to accommodate the incapacity of any director, officer, employee, or agent; and
    • (2) relocate the principal office, designate alternative principal offices or regional offices, or authorize the officers to do so.
  • (b) During an emergency defined in subsection (d), unless emergency bylaws provide otherwise:
    • (1) notice of a meeting of the board of directors need be given only to those directors whom it is practicable to reach and may be given in any practicable manner; and
    • 2) one or more officers of the corporation present at a meeting of the board of directors may be deemed to be directors for the meeting, in order of rank and within the same rank in order of seniority, asto the extent necessary to achieve a quorum.
  • (b) During an emergency, unless emergency bylaws provide otherwise, the board of directors may postpone a meeting of shareholders for which notice has been given or authorize shareholders to participate in a meeting by any means of remote communication that conforms with section 7.09(b). The corporation shall give notice to shareholders, by such means and with such shorter advance notice as are reasonable in the circumstances, of any such postponement, including any new date, time, or place, and describe any means of remote communication to be used.
  • (c) Corporate action taken in good faith under this section during an emergency under this section to further the ordinary business and affairs of the corporation:
    • (1) binds the corporation; and
    • (2) may not be used to impose liability as a result of any such action on a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation.
  • (d) An emergency exists for purposes of this sectionsubsection (a) if a quorum of the board of directors cannot readily be assembled because of some catastrophic event., and for purposes of subsection (b) if, because of some catastrophic event, it is impracticable to convene a meeting of shareholders in accordance with the Act or the bylaws or as specified in a notice for the meeting previously given.

Cross-References

Corporate powers, see § 3.02.

Emergency bylaws, see § 2.07.

Notice of directors’ meeting, see § 8.22.

Notice of shareholders’ meeting, see § 7.05.

Notices and other communications, see § 1.41.

Notice of directors’ meeting, see § 8.22.

“Principal office” defined, see § 1.40.

Remote participation in shareholders’ meetings; meetings held solely by remote participation, see § 7.09.

Requirements for and functions of board of directors, see § 8.01.

Standards of conduct for directors, see § 8.30.

Official Comment

Section 3.03 should be read in conjunction with section 2.07, which authorizes a corporation to adopt emergency bylaws. Section 3.03 grants every corporation limited powers to act in an emergency even though it has failed to adopt emergency bylaws under section 2.07.during an emergency even though it may not have adopted emergency bylaws. Sections 2.07 and 3.03 do not limit powers that otherwise exist absent or during an emergency. For example, while a board of directors typically has the power under common law to postpone a meeting of shareholders, section 3.03(b) provides relief during an emergency from applicable notice provisions. In acting pursuant to section 3.03, including for purposes of providing notice to shareholders that is “reasonable in the circumstances” for purposes of subsection (b), directors remain subject to the standards of conduct set forth in section 8.30.