U.S. Supreme Court takes aim at Fraudulent Conveyance Schemes

U.S. Supreme Court takes aim at Fraudulent Conveyance Schemes

June 28, 2016

On May 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (No. 15-145), holding that the term "actual fraud" in § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code (one of the discharge exceptions) applies to fraudulent conveyance schemes even when those schemes do not involve a false representation.  Join us via webinar to listen to a panel of bankruptcy experts, including G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. who has argued 10 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and authored an amicus curiae brief in the Husky case to hear about the wide ranging impacts and opportunities this decision will have on businesses operating in the consumer bankruptcy environment.

Members of the Business Law Section may access the program materials and video from this program. Log in using your email address.

Premium Content for:

  • ABA Business Law Section Members
Join Now

Already a member? Log In


Advertisement

  • Join the Section