Issuing a Proactive Statement
While Hennes discussed crisis response communications, McMahon discussed situations where a response isn’t needed immediately. McMahon said that one goal for the CMBA was to become the “go-to organization on matters of law and justice” in the region.
The CMBA created the Thought Leadership Committee, which is responsible for evaluating requests for public positions, as well as proactively identifying issues that the CMBA should comment on and build its programming around. The committee has 15 members.
When a potential issue comes up, the committee has three criteria that determines whether the bar should weigh in:
- Does this impact the practice of law or the legal profession?
- Does this issue affect the independence or integrity of the judiciary?
- Does this impact the effectiveness or accessibility of the legal system?
There is also a fourth question for unique situations where a response might be warranted – Would speaking out be consistent with our mission? McMahon noted that the CMBA recently used these criteria to take a position on Issue 1, which was a special election whether to change the state Constitution to require a supermajority for changes.
If the issue does impact the practice of law or the legal profession, the thought leadership committee continues with two other steps:
- Does speaking out further the interest of the CMBA?
- Will a vast majority of our members agree with the position?
McMahon admitted that finding a ‘vast majority’ was not an exact science, but through member surveys, discussions with sections and committees, and board representation, she believes they are able to take an accurate pulse of the membership regarding statements.
Since 2018, the CMBA has issued 24 public statements, and they have declined in 13 instances to issue formal positions. And even if the CMBA doesn’t have an official position, McMahon stated that the bar can still be a thought leader by holding programs or convening public conversations to help educate the community on the given topic.
After the bar issued a statement on Issue 1, McMahon said that she got some member complaints, but she responded to each one personally explaining how the bar arrived at their position. “Almost every single time I send one of those emails out, the person who was hot and angry that we issued this, replies with a ‘I had no idea there was so much thought that went into this,’” said McMahon.