The Supreme Court decided two cases on May 18, 2023 interpreting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which aims to promote free expression on the Internet while providing protections for online intermediaries. Although an influx of academics, organizers, and everyday individuals hoped that the decisions would modernize the law, for now, not much has changed.
Congress originally enacted Section 230 in 1996 to promote free expression during the early stages of the Internet. The law protected online platforms that hosted users who posted content, shielding platforms from being treated as publishers of third-party materials—a shift from how traditional media sources (e.g., newspapers and magazines) operate.
In recent years, critics have argued that Section 230 is outdated. The Internet has changed since 1996, and increasingly, technology companies appear to be immunized from harmful content posted on their platforms. Against this backdrop, two separate actions were brought before the Supreme Court by family members of American citizens killed during ISIS terrorist attacks: Twitter v. Taamneh and Gonzalez v. Google. Both cases demonstrate how the modern Internet, which contains everything from algorithms to live videos, may not fit into the language of Section 230 at its passing.