Feb

    Woodman's Food v. Clorox: Does Package Size Constitute a Promotional Service Under the Robinson Patman Act?

    1 PM EST

    The Woodman's Food Market v. Clorox litigation has drawn enormous attention. The district court's interpretation of the Robinson-Patman Act calls into question not only manufacturers' ability to offer different package sizes of their products to different outlets, but also the long-established Colgate doctrine that sellers may choose with whom they do business. The case is now on appeal in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Federal Trade Commission has filed an amicus brief urging reversal and advocating a narrow view of Section 2(e) of the Robinson-Patman Act.
       
    Moderator:

    * Dionne Lomax - Mintz Levin

    Speakers:

    * Julie Goshorn - Federal Trade Commission
    * David Kesselman - Kesselman, Brantly & Stockinger LLP
    * David Schwartz, Unilever

    For this and all upcoming events visit https://shop.americanbar.org/eBus/ABAEventsCalendar.aspx

    FREE:  Antitrust Section Members, Government, Non-profit Employees, Students
    $25 Other Non-Members

    Explore Section benefits or call 1-800-285-2221 to join. Code RAT14IP25.   For this and all upcoming events visit http://AmBar.org/ATEvents.
     
    CLE
    The ABA is not seeking CLE credit for this program.

    Audio Archive
    Provided all releases are obtained, MP3 recordings of this program will be available to Section members on the Committee Program Audio page.

     

     


     

    $25
    NON-MEMBERS
    $10
    MEMBERS
    $0
    SECTION MEMBERS
    Register Now *Additional discounts may apply at checkout

    Log In to view your rate

    Woodman's Food v. Clorox: Does Package Size Constditute a Promotional Service Under the Robinson Patman Act?

    Event Details

    Format

    Teleconference

    Date

    Feb 02, 2016

    2016-02-02T13:00:00-05:00 2016-02-02T14:00:00-05:00 Woodman's Food v. Clorox: Does Package Size Constitute a Promotional Service Under the Robinson Patman Act?

    The Woodman's Food Market v. Clorox litigation has drawn enormous attention. The district court's interpretation of the Robinson-Patman Act calls into question not only manufacturers' ability to offer different package sizes of their products to different outlets, but also the long-established Colgate doctrine that sellers may choose with whom they do business. The case is now on appeal in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Federal Trade Commission has filed an amicus brief urging reversal and advocating a narrow view of Section 2(e) of the Robinson-Patman Act.
       
    Moderator:

    * Dionne Lomax - Mintz Levin

    Speakers:

    * Julie Goshorn - Federal Trade Commission
    * David Kesselman - Kesselman, Brantly & Stockinger LLP
    * David Schwartz, Unilever

    For this and all upcoming events visit https://shop.americanbar.org/eBus/ABAEventsCalendar.aspx

    FREE:  Antitrust Section Members, Government, Non-profit Employees, Students
    $25 Other Non-Members

    Explore Section benefits or call 1-800-285-2221 to join. Code RAT14IP25.   For this and all upcoming events visit http://AmBar.org/ATEvents.
     
    CLE
    The ABA is not seeking CLE credit for this program.

    Audio Archive
    Provided all releases are obtained, MP3 recordings of this program will be available to Section members on the Committee Program Audio page.

     

     


     

    Sponsors

    Pricing Conduct

    Section of Antitrust Law

    Co-sponsors

    Corporate Counseling

    Related Products

    Related On-Demand CLE