Publications | Book
A Court Divided: October Term 2023
Some federal agencies have been routinely and successfully adjudicating administrative cases on behalf of agencies for many years. From a practical stand-point, this has occurred because agencies have a need to manage docket loads that can fluctuate greatly from year to year. But more importantly, adjudication by "outside" judges helps to alleviate inherent conflicts of interest, and the public perception of unfairness. These "mini" federal central panels also help to achieve economies of scale. At the state level, a majority of states across the country have also utilized a central panel structure to adjudicate cases for their respective government agencies for years. They have uniformly found this system to be more economically efficient and more amenable to public interest notions of fairness. A distinguished panel of judges and academics will discuss why a federal central panel system would be highly advantageous in comparison to the current system of disparate adjudication systems within scores of individual agencies.
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Available for credit
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
Substantive Law
Status:
Available for credit
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Available for credit
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Applied for upon completion
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
12/31/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2027
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
12/31/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.80 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Available for credit
1.80 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Applied for upon completion
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Available for credit
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.80 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Reciprocity
1.80 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2027
1.50 total credit hours including
Areas of Professional Practice
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
2.00 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Applied for
2.00 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
Substantive
Status:
Available for credit
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Available for credit
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.80 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Approved
1.80 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
Law & Legal Procedure
Status:
Approved
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2027
1.80 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Applied for
1.80 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
1.50 total credit hours including
General
Status:
Self apply
1.50 credit hours
Available until:
05/02/2025
Log In to view your rate
Unlock the discounted member rate
Join first as a member, and then purchase this product at special member pricing
Closed Captioned.
The concept is simple. One federal agency should be created to adjudicate administrative hearings that are currently being adjudicated by scores of different federal agencies. This concept is known as a federal central panel (FCP), and is perhaps the best tool that could be employed to ensure fairness in administrative hearings.
Implementation of a FCP system is long overdue. Small FCPs already exist throughout the federal government, and have developed organically out of necessity. Extensive academic study to justify the need for a FCP system is obviated by the fact that actual, real-life laboratories for the central panel concept have successfully existed at the state level for many years. In fact, the central panel concept has been implemented in the majority of U.S. states, and the number is continuing to expand.
Central panel systems enjoy many advantages over the current system of disparate administrative tribunals. First, the total economic cost of the various systems can be substantially reduced by the economies of scale that would be achieved in having a central system. Second, and perhaps most importantly, a FCP would greatly help to alleviate the inherent conflict of interest that exists when a Respondent looks across the room and sees a judge and agency counsel, both of whom are employed by the same employer. The public is completely unaware of the other ties between the judge and the agency, such as decisions regarding the judge's personnel and employment benefits, the hiring and firing process for judges, performance evaluations for some judges, and the internal appeals process. Third, public confidence in the administrative adjudication process would be greatly enhanced, which benefits the agencies as well as the public. Fourth, without increasing salaries, a FCP structure would benefit the public, and improve the working environment for judges, by allowing judges to supervise judges, and by allowing judges to pursue varied career paths within the FCP. Fifth, the proposed structure is very flexible, and could easily accommodate jurisdiction over certain types of cases, while excluding others. Also, for the vast majority of agency adjudications, specialized expertise of ALJs and AJs can be easily retained through the transfer of functions process utilized heretofore by many agencies. Sixth, the FCP can be easily structured so as to accommodate applicable Constitutional requirements as set out in the recent Seila Law decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Danette Mincey, Jeffrey S Lubbers, Richard James Pierce Jr, Richard West, Robert J Lesnick, Robert L Glicksman
Thomson Reuters
JD2205FJNOLC
90
5/3/2022 12:00:00 AM
Publications | Book
A Court Divided: October Term 2023
Publications | Book
The Lobbying Manual: A Complete Guide to Federal Lobbying Law and Practice, Sixth Edition
Publications | Book
What Is Happening to State Trial Court Civil Filings?: The Unsolved Riddles
Mar
12
Events | Webinar
Celebrating Trailblazing Black Women Lawyers
This program will celebrate and commemorate the contributions of thre trailblazing black women lawyers to whom began practicing law more than a century ago and one who has been practicing law in the…
Feb
26
Events | Webinar
Ethics, Uses and Abuses of Generative AI (GAI) for Attorneys and Judges [CC]
ETHICS 90 min
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) may implicate privacy issues arising out of the use of personal data as well as confidential corporate data, all of which might lead to claims of, among other…
Sep
09
Events | Webinar
Intersections of GenAI and Cybersecurity: Reckoning and Responding to the Risks [CC]
CLE 240 min
The rapid emergence of GenAI tools challenges counsel and courts to determine whether and when they may responsibly use GenAI tools. This program aims at enabling judicial clerks, judges, and counsel…