What Should Law School Rankings Measure and How Should We Measure It: A Comment on Heald and Sichelman’s Rankings

ABSTRACT: There are obvious benefits to ranking academic departments based on objective measures of faculty research output. However, there are considerable difficulties associated with producing reliable and accurate rankings. In this short comment, we offer an evaluation of Heald and Sichelman's recent foray into the project of ranking law schools. Heald and Sichelman are to be commended for the transparency and rigor of their rankings effort. At the same time, it is important to note that their rankings involve a series of contestable discretionary choices and could give rise to potential counterproductive gaming by law schools seeking to improve their place in the rankings.

Adam Chilton and Jonathan Masur

Premium Content For:
  • Science and Technology Law Section
Join - Now